On Thu, 2016-03-31 at 11:08 +0200, John Crispin wrote:

On 31/03/2016 04:32, Yingjoe Chen wrote:

quoted

On Thu, 2016-03-31 at 09:40 +0800, Henry Chen wrote:

quoted

On Wed, 2016-03-30 at 11:18 +0200, John Crispin wrote:

quoted

Hi,

small nitpick inline

On 30/03/2016 09:25, Henry Chen wrote:

quoted

Some sub driver like RTC module need irq domain from parent to create
irq mapping when driver initialize. so move mt6397_irq_init() before
mfd_add_devices().

Signed-off-by: Henry Chen <redacted>
---
This patch fixed the below warning based on "Linux kernel v4.6-rc1"
WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 132 at kernel/mediatek/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c:471
irq_create_mapping+0xc4/0xd0
---
 drivers/mfd/mt6397-core.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mfd/mt6397-core.c b/drivers/mfd/mt6397-core.c
index 8e8d932..a879223 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/mt6397-core.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/mt6397-core.c

@@ -270,22 +270,36 @@ static int mt6397_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		goto fail_irq;
 	}
 
+	pmic->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
+
 	switch (id & 0xff) {
 	case MT6323_CID_CODE:
-		pmic->int_con[0] = MT6323_INT_CON0;
-		pmic->int_con[1] = MT6323_INT_CON1;
-		pmic->int_status[0] = MT6323_INT_STATUS0;
-		pmic->int_status[1] = MT6323_INT_STATUS1;
+		if (pmic->irq > 0) {

should this not be

		if (pmic->irq >= 0) {

i think the code before your patch was wrong as linux irqs start with 0.

	John

Hi John,

Thanks, I will modify this.

Linux irq start from 1, 0 is invalid. I can't find the document saying
this now, but you could see this from irq_create_mapping() in
kernel/irq/irqdomain.c

I think the code should have check return from platform_get_irq and
handle -EPROBE_DEFER, but maybe it should be another patch?

BTW, in this function, it is possible that pmic->irq_domain will be NULL
in fail_irq error handling. We should check before calling
irq_domain_remove.

Joe.C

Hi,

looking at
http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/drivers/base/platform.c#L87 there
is a check in line #100 ret >= 0

checking the return value of pmic->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
should follow the same pattern i think .. unless i have a thinko and am
reading the code wrong.

I'm not sure why platform_get_irq() check for 0, but I think the code
logic is differnet.

When platform_get_irq() return 0 to our code, it means we don't have
valid irq to use. In this case it doesn't make any sense to continue
init irq.


Joe.C