Who is going to merge it [Was: Re: [PATCH v14 0/17] Add Analogix Core Display Port Driver]
From: inki.dae@samsung.com (Inki Dae)
Date: 2016-03-22 23:09:49
Also in:
dri-devel, linux-devicetree, linux-rockchip, linux-samsung-soc, lkml
2016? 03? 23? 07:52? Heiko St?bner ?(?) ? ?:
Am Mittwoch, 23. M?rz 2016, 07:44:59 schrieb Inki Dae:quoted
+ Ajay kumar with Samsung email Hi, 2016? 03? 23? 07:12? Heiko St?bner ?(?) ? ?:quoted
Hi, Am Dienstag, 22. M?rz 2016, 16:19:37 schrieb Javier Martinez Canillas:quoted
On 03/18/2016 07:53 PM, Doug Anderson wrote:quoted
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 11:41 PM, Caesar Wang [off-list ref]wrote:quoted
Same here, this is the second time I tested this series (first time was v6 on October 25 [2]) and I think that has been out there for too long.quoted
Tested-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>Tested-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <redacted>So we have 3 tests (Doug, Caesar and me) for the Rockchip side as well as Javier for the Exynos side based on the most recent drm state. As said by a lot of people it would be cool to get this merged soon - hopefully directly after -rc1. The only remaining question is through which tree it should go. I guess there are two basic options: - Inki takes the series - we could see the Rockchip-Ack being implied but maybe Mark can provide an explicit one - Mark takes the series with an Ack from Inki for the shared parts Inki, Mark do you have a preference?The problem would be that there is no drm bridge maintainer. I think the most suitable person as the maintainer would be Ajay Kumar who is an author of drm bridge framework. Of course, I could take them and have pull-request again. But it seems a little late. Dave had already pull-request.I really meant that for 4.7, not for the current merge window. I just want to make sure it goes into a maintainer tree shortly after v4.6-rc1, before something else changes the exynos-dp again :-).quoted
To Ajay, How about adding you as a drm bridge maintainer? DRM SoC driver maintainers would need a person who can manage the drm bridge relevant pathes.The previous example (dw_hdmi generalization between imx and rockchip) did just go through the imx tree. So either the Samsung or Rockchip drm-trees might be enough?
In this case, someone else may send an email again like you "who is going to merge?" That would be why we need a maintainer. drm panel is already managed well by Thierry Reding without such confusion. Thanks, Inki Dae
Heiko