Thread (43 messages) flat view 43 messages, 12 authors, 2016-08-01

Who is going to merge it [Was: Re: [PATCH v14 0/17] Add Analogix Core Display Port Driver]

From: inki.dae@samsung.com (Inki Dae)
Date: 2016-03-22 23:09:49
Also in: dri-devel, linux-devicetree, linux-rockchip, linux-samsung-soc, lkml


2016? 03? 23? 07:52? Heiko St?bner ?(?) ? ?:
Am Mittwoch, 23. M?rz 2016, 07:44:59 schrieb Inki Dae:
quoted
+ Ajay kumar with Samsung email

Hi,

2016? 03? 23? 07:12? Heiko St?bner ?(?) ? ?:
quoted
Hi,

Am Dienstag, 22. M?rz 2016, 16:19:37 schrieb Javier Martinez Canillas:
quoted
On 03/18/2016 07:53 PM, Doug Anderson wrote:
quoted
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 11:41 PM, Caesar Wang
[off-list ref]
wrote:
quoted
Same here, this is the second time I tested this series (first time was
v6 on October 25 [2]) and I think that has been out there for too long.
quoted
Tested-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <redacted>
So we have 3 tests (Doug, Caesar and me) for the Rockchip side as well as
Javier for the Exynos side based on the most recent drm state.

As said by a lot of people it would be cool to get this merged soon -
hopefully directly after -rc1. The only remaining question is through
which
tree it should go.

I guess there are two basic options:
- Inki takes the series - we could see the Rockchip-Ack being implied but
maybe Mark can provide an explicit one
- Mark takes the series with an Ack from Inki for the shared parts

Inki, Mark do you have a preference?
The problem would be that there is no drm bridge maintainer. I think the
most suitable person as the maintainer would be Ajay Kumar who is an author
of drm bridge framework. Of course, I could take them and have pull-request
again. But it seems a little late. Dave had already pull-request.
I really meant that for 4.7, not for the current merge window. I just want to 
make sure it goes into a maintainer tree shortly after v4.6-rc1, before 
something else changes the exynos-dp again :-).

quoted
To Ajay,
How about adding you as a drm bridge maintainer? DRM SoC driver maintainers
would need a person who can manage the drm bridge relevant pathes.
The previous example (dw_hdmi generalization between imx and rockchip) did 
just go through the imx tree. So either the Samsung or Rockchip drm-trees 
might be enough?
In this case, someone else may send an email again like you "who is going to merge?"
That would be why we need a maintainer.

drm panel is already managed well by Thierry Reding without such confusion. 

Thanks,
Inki Dae

Heiko
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help