[PATCH v4 2/8] Documentation: arm: define DT cpu capacity bindings
From: broonie@kernel.org (Mark Brown)
Date: 2016-03-21 12:12:34
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-pm, lkml
From: broonie@kernel.org (Mark Brown)
Date: 2016-03-21 12:12:34
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-pm, lkml
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 11:49:56AM +0000, Juri Lelli wrote:
But we'll still need to normalize this w.r.t the highest score we get on a specific platform, right? And while we are at normalizing it, it is probably simpler if we keep the frequency component as part of the number, IMHO. But, maybe keeping the frequency component separate is more acceptable from a DT binding perspective?
One possible issue with that: if we keep the frequency number as part of the core number then that might cause issues for devices with variants or system deployment decisions that remove some OPPs from a table. If the top OPP gets removed that would throw off the numbers. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 473 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20160321/b094a354/attachment.sig>