Thread (4 messages) flat view 4 messages, 2 authors, 2016-03-02

[PATCH 4/6] pwm: pwm-lpc18xx-sct: test clock rate to avoid division by 0

From: Joachim Eastwood <hidden>
Date: 2016-03-02 22:44:06
Also in: linux-pwm, linux-renesas-soc, lkml

Hi Wolfram,

On 2 March 2016 at 23:33, Wolfram Sang [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>

The clk API may return 0 on clk_get_rate, so we should check the result before
using it as a divisor.

Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
---

Should go individually via subsystem tree.

 drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc18xx-sct.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc18xx-sct.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc18xx-sct.c
index 9163085101bc94..6487962c355c03 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc18xx-sct.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc18xx-sct.c
@@ -360,6 +360,8 @@ static int lpc18xx_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
        }

        lpc18xx_pwm->clk_rate = clk_get_rate(lpc18xx_pwm->pwm_clk);
+       if (!lpc18xx_pwm->clk_rate)
+               return -EINVAL;
This needs to be:
if (!lpc18xx_pwm->clk_rate) {
    ret = -EINVAL;
    goto disable_pwmclk;
}

I would also prefer an explicit check against 0 here. ie.:
'lpc18xx_pwm->clk_rate == 0'
A dev_err() message would also be nice to have.


regards,
Joachim Eastwood
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help