Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2016-02-25
DORMANTno replies REVIEWED: 3 (3M)

1 review trailer.

[PATCH] drivers: perf: arm: implement CPU_PM notifier

From: khilman@baylibre.com (Kevin Hilman)
Date: 2016-02-25 21:55:23

Will Deacon [off-list ref] writes:
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 09:32:17AM -0700, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
quoted
On 25 February 2016 at 02:44, Lorenzo Pieralisi
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 05:10:20PM -0800, Kevin Hilman wrote:
quoted
Lorenzo Pieralisi [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
When a CPU is suspended (either through suspend-to-RAM or CPUidle),
its PMU registers content can be lost, which means that counters
registers values that were initialized on power down entry have to be
reprogrammed on power-up to make sure the counters set-up is preserved
This assumes that the PMUs are always sharing a power rail with a
specific CPU, not the cluster.  Is that a reliable assumption?
As reliable as assuming the GIC HW state needs save/restore on idle-state
entry, if we have no power domains information linked to CPU PM
notifiers saving/restoring everything every time an idle state deeper
than wfi is entered is the best we can do.

As far as this patch is concerned, if the PMU is on a different power
domain than the CPU, I agree that stopping/resetting/restoring the
PMU registers is a waste of cycles (I will test it also by triggering
the notifiers on wfi, to make sure the reset is not disruptive on
a cpu that is not powered off), I see no alternative other than disabling
idle to carry out profiling sanely (or implement CPU PM notifiers with
runtime PM).
I totally understand - I'm faced with the same problem on Coresight.
To me the ultimate solution is still to integrate CPU power domain
management with runtime PM (like we talked about many times before).
I know Lina is working on something that will get us close to that but
it's not finished yet.
I've been waiting for that code for *years* now...
It's still coming... ;)

But, I didn't mean to suggest this patch should wait for a PM domain
based solution, I just wanted to be clear about the assumptions.  I have
no objections to this patch as it fixes a long-standing issue.

Acked-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>

Kevin
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help