[PATCH v12 03/21] KVM: ARM64: Add offset defines for PMU registers
From: Marc Zyngier <hidden>
Date: 2016-02-23 08:33:13
Also in:
kvm, kvmarm
On 23/02/16 01:46, Shannon Zhao wrote:
On 2016/2/23 1:51, Marc Zyngier wrote:quoted
On 22/02/16 09:37, Shannon Zhao wrote:quoted
From: Shannon Zhao <redacted> We are about to trap and emulate accesses to each PMU register individually. This adds the context offsets for the AArch64 PMU registers. Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao <redacted> Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <redacted> Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <redacted> --- arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 15 +++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h index 6f0241f..6bab7fb 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h@@ -115,6 +115,21 @@ enum vcpu_sysreg { MDSCR_EL1, /* Monitor Debug System Control Register */ MDCCINT_EL1, /* Monitor Debug Comms Channel Interrupt Enable Reg */ + /* Performance Monitors Registers */ + PMCR_EL0, /* Control Register */ + PMOVSSET_EL0, /* Overflow Flag Status Set Register */ + PMSELR_EL0, /* Event Counter Selection Register */ + PMEVCNTR0_EL0, /* Event Counter Register (0-30) */ + PMEVCNTR30_EL0 = PMEVCNTR0_EL0 + 30, + PMCCNTR_EL0, /* Cycle Counter Register */ + PMEVTYPER0_EL0, /* Event Type Register (0-30) */ + PMEVTYPER30_EL0 = PMEVTYPER0_EL0 + 30, + PMCCFILTR_EL0, /* Cycle Count Filter Register */ + PMCNTENSET_EL0, /* Count Enable Set Register */ + PMINTENSET_EL1, /* Interrupt Enable Set Register */ + PMUSERENR_EL0, /* User Enable Register */ + PMSWINC_EL0, /* Software Increment Register */ +I've just noticed a rather fundamental issue with this: this makes it impossible to bisect the whole series.Ah, sorry. Will fix this.
Thanks.
quoted
I was trying to pinpoint a performance regression with this series, and started bisecting.You mean this series introduce a performance regression? Is there any method to measure that? Then I can have a look too.
I'm not quite sure this is related to this series. What I'm observing is that hackbench runs faster in a VM spawned with kvmtool than the same VM run with qemu. As in significantly faster (62 vs 55 seconds - 2 vcpus, 1GB memory). Given that hackbench doesn't do any IO, I don't really see why we should see a difference. I'll add support for the PMU to kvmtool today, and I'll be able to see if that has any impact. M. -- Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...