[PATCH] drivers/perf: arm_pmu: make info messages more verbose
flat view
STALE3909d
From: Dirk Behme <hidden>
Date: 2016-02-01 16:43:23
On 12.01.2016 09:22, Dirk Behme wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
On a big.LITTLE system e.g. with Cortex A57 and A53 in case not all cores are online at PMU probe time we might get hw perfevents: failed to probe PMU! hw perfevents: failed to register PMU devices! making it unclear which cores failed, here. Add the name of the PMU which failed resulting in a more verbose and helpful message hw perfevents: armv8_cortex_a53: failed to probe PMU! hw perfevents: armv8_cortex_a53: failed to register PMU devices! Signed-off-by: Dirk Behme <redacted> --- drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c index be3755c..fc1f06f 100644 --- a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c +++ b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c@@ -904,7 +904,7 @@ int arm_pmu_device_probe(struct platform_device *pdev, } if (ret) { - pr_info("failed to probe PMU!\n"); + pr_info("%s: failed to probe PMU!\n", pmu->name); goto out_free; }@@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ int arm_pmu_device_probe(struct platform_device *pdev, out_destroy: cpu_pmu_destroy(pmu); out_free: - pr_info("failed to register PMU devices!\n"); + pr_info("%s: failed to register PMU devices!\n", pmu->name); kfree(pmu); return ret; }
Any comments on this? If not, how to get this applied? Best regards Dirk