On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 7:46 PM, Matthias Brugger [off-list ref] wrote:

On 26/01/16 11:23, Daniel Kurtz wrote:

quoted

Hi Michael, Pi-Cheng,

On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 1:06 AM, Michael Turquette
[off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On 12/01, Pi-Cheng Chen wrote:

quoted

On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 11:48 AM, Daniel Kurtz [off-list ref]
wrote:

quoted

Hi Pi-Cheng and Michael,

On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 7:27 PM, Pi-Cheng Chen
[off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

From: "pi-cheng.chen" <redacted>

This patch adds CPU mux clocks which are used by Mediatek cpufreq
driver
for intermediate clock source switching.

It looks like this patch was never picked up.
It is required for MT8173 cpufreq.

What is the plan to get this one merged?

Hi Dan,
Mike is working on a new CCF feature called "coordinated clock rate
changes"
which would help to migrate mt8173-cpufreq driver to generic cpufreq-dt
driver, and I am working with him to port MT8173 clock driver on the new
feature. So I think that's why this patch was not picked since it will
be migrated to new implementation once the new feature's ready.

@Mike:
Are you plannig to post those patches on the mailing list ?
Or is it fine for you to take this first and then I will refine it for
the new feature later?

I plan to post those patches next week.

Were these patches ever posted?
Or should we consider going ahead and trying to merge this 4-month old
MTK CPU mux clock patch into v4.5 before it is too late?

It's already too late for v4.5. The -rc are mostly bug fixes and new
features get merged after the official v4.5 release. They will show up in
v4.6-rc1

Which will show up in v4.6-rc1?  MediaTek's CPU mux clocks, or Mike's
"coordinated clock rate changes"?