[PATCH] clk: sunxi: allow PLL6 clock to be reused
From: andre.przywara@arm.com (André Przywara)
Date: 2016-02-25 20:58:05
Also in:
linux-clk
On 25/02/16 18:11, Maxime Ripard wrote:
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 09:38:53AM +0000, Andre Przywara wrote:quoted
quoted
quoted
diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-factors.h b/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-factors.h index 1e63c5b..3a7da86 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-factors.h +++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-factors.h@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ struct factors_data { void (*getter)(struct factors_request *req); void (*recalc)(struct factors_request *req); const char *name; + int name_idx;I would drop the .name field. It was a bad workaround due to limitations of the factors clk code at the time by me. We really shouldn't hard-code the name if we want to reuse the driver.I know what you mean (my first thought, too) and I totally agree, but we need it still for PLL5, which does not carry the original name in the DT output names. So at least this workaround here does not work, I guess we have to come up with something different - which would be a different patch. I can take a look into this later.Actually, it could be easily worked around. Always take the first clock output name, take whatever is before '_', and you can remove the name field entirely.
Yeah, I was thinking about that, too, but wanted to give an easy patch a try first.
Jens did something along these lines here: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-October/379900.html
Indeed, I stumbled upon this by accident today. Looks great on the first glance: using .self first, then the stub till the underscore. I can review and test this, if needed.
Maybe we should simply rebase this patch, and remove the part that falls back on the name field.
I am totally fine with this! Thanks! Andre.