[PATCH v12 5/5] arm64, mm, numa: Add NUMA balancing support for arm64.
From: Will Deacon <hidden>
Date: 2016-02-26 18:53:51
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-efi, lkml
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 05:58:23PM -0800, David Daney wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
From: Ganapatrao Kulkarni <redacted> Enable NUMA balancing for arm64 platforms. Add pte, pmd protnone helpers for use by automatic NUMA balancing. Reviewed-by: Robert Richter <redacted> Signed-off-by: Ganapatrao Kulkarni <redacted> Signed-off-by: David Daney <redacted> --- arch/arm64/Kconfig | 1 + arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h | 15 +++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+)diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig index 9f0972a..6e22503 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ config ARM64 select ARCH_HAS_TICK_BROADCAST if GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS_BROADCAST select ARCH_USE_CMPXCHG_LOCKREF select ARCH_SUPPORTS_ATOMIC_RMW + select ARCH_SUPPORTS_NUMA_BALANCING select ARCH_WANT_OPTIONAL_GPIOLIB select ARCH_WANT_COMPAT_IPC_PARSE_VERSION select ARCH_WANT_FRAME_POINTERSdiff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h index bf464de..5af9db2 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h@@ -346,6 +346,21 @@ static inline pgprot_t mk_sect_prot(pgprot_t prot) return __pgprot(pgprot_val(prot) & ~PTE_TABLE_BIT); } +#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING +/* + * See the comment in include/asm-generic/pgtable.h + */ +static inline int pte_protnone(pte_t pte) +{ + return (pte_val(pte) & (PTE_VALID | PTE_PROT_NONE)) == PTE_PROT_NONE; +} + +static inline int pmd_protnone(pmd_t pmd) +{ + return pte_protnone(pmd_pte(pmd)); +} +#endif
Can these not be macros, like our other pte_* and pmd_* predicates in this header file? Will