[PATCH 3/5] all: s390: move wrapper infrastructure to generic headers
From: Heiko Carstens <hidden>
Date: 2016-02-25 22:20:57
Also in:
linux-arch, linux-s390, lkml
From: Heiko Carstens <hidden>
Date: 2016-02-25 22:20:57
Also in:
linux-arch, linux-s390, lkml
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 11:23:50PM +0300, Yury Norov wrote:
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 09:51:40AM +0100, Heiko Carstens wrote:quoted
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 09:34:12PM +0300, Yury Norov wrote:quoted
diff --git a/include/linux/syscalls_structs.h b/include/linux/syscalls_structs.h new file mode 100644 index 0000000..a920cbc --- /dev/null +++ b/include/linux/syscalls_structs.h@@ -0,0 +1,60 @@ +#ifndef _LINUX_SYSCALL_STRUCTS_H +#define _LINUX_SYSCALL_STRUCTS_H + +struct epoll_event; +struct iattr; +struct inode; +struct iocb; +struct io_event; +struct iovec; +struct itimerspec; +struct itimerval;This is not needed for s390, right? So might be worth a separate patch which moves the forward declarations?This patch also introduces __SC_WRAP, not needed as well. The idea of this patch is to introduce all the tricky machinery at once. If you think we need split it, I'm OK, but maybe it's enough to add more detailed description... What do you think?
Ok, I see. Then the only change I'd like to request is to update the comment in front of the COMPAT_SYSCALL_WRAPx macro which talks about 33/31 bit pointer sizes. This doesn't make too much sense for common code :)