[GIT PULL 3/7] drivers: soc: EXYNOS drivers for v4.6

On 25.02.2016 13:19, pankaj.dubey wrote:

Hi Krzysztof,

quoted

quoted

OMAP has GPMC drivers under drivers/memory. I wonder if SROM should go there
too, since it's a quite similar bus.

I wish I get this feedback before, when we were discussing the SROM
patches. :/

Indeed this sounds reasonable. On some boards the omap-gpmc is used for
the same purpose: interfacing to smsc,lan9115 (like on SMDK5410).

quoted

Feel free to respin this without SROM now, so we can get the other pieces in
sooner and then revisit the SROM asyncronously. That'll remove the dependencies
on DT as well.

Okay, I'll rebase all drivers/soc branches and respin the pull request
so PMU driver and other stuff could go in.

BTW, just in case, although PMU stands for "Power Management Unit" I
don't think it should be placed under drivers/power because it is not a
avs/charger/battery/reset driver. Existing power-related drivers are
under driver/soc (bcm, dove, tegra).

Re-work of SROM drivers could be started on top of it.

Please let me know if I need to take care of any of this work.

Yes, unfortunately I need your help with that.

I rebased mach-exynos/drivers-soc related patches and pushed it to my
next/soc branch:
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/krzk/linux.git/log/?h=next/soc

There are some changes in commits, mostly for movement of PMU driver
(now it is applied first, before SROMc driver). I also applied some of
the cleanup and maintainer patches from SROMc patchset. DT changes are
already merged.

Overall, could you rebase remaining patches on top of my next/soc and
move SROM driver to drivers/memory? You can also rebase Pavel Fedin's
patches (if you don't I will rebase them).


Last version of applied SROMc patches is here:
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/krzk/linux.git/log/?h=for-v4.6/drivers-soc-exynos-srom-pmu

Best regards,
Krzysztof