Thread (26 messages) 26 messages, 4 authors, 2016-03-28

[PATCH V7 4/6] i2c: qup: Add bam dma capabilities

From: Sricharan <hidden>
Date: 2016-02-22 12:25:11
Also in: linux-arm-msm, linux-devicetree, linux-i2c, lkml

Hi Wolfram,
-----Original Message-----
From: Sricharan [mailto:sricharan at codeaurora.org]
Sent: Saturday, February 13, 2016 12:29 PM
To: 'Wolfram Sang'
Cc: 'devicetree at vger.kernel.org'; 'linux-arm-msm at vger.kernel.org';
'agross at codeaurora.org'; 'linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org'; 'linux-
i2c at vger.kernel.org'; 'iivanov at mm-sol.com'; 'galak at codeaurora.org';
'dmaengine at vger.kernel.org'; 'linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org';
'andy.gross at linaro.org'; 'ntelkar at codeaurora.org';
'architt at codeaurora.org'
Subject: RE: [PATCH V7 4/6] i2c: qup: Add bam dma capabilities

Hi Wolfram,
quoted
-----Original Message-----
From: Wolfram Sang [mailto:wsa at the-dreams.de]
Sent: Saturday, February 13, 2016 12:08 AM
To: Sricharan R
Cc: devicetree at vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-msm at vger.kernel.org;
agross at codeaurora.org; linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org; linux-
i2c at vger.kernel.org; iivanov at mm-sol.com; galak at codeaurora.org;
dmaengine at vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org;
andy.gross at linaro.org; ntelkar at codeaurora.org; architt at codeaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 4/6] i2c: qup: Add bam dma capabilities

On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 03:32:44PM +0530, Sricharan R wrote:
quoted
QUP cores can be attached to a BAM module, which acts as a dma
engine for the QUP core. When DMA with BAM is enabled, the BAM
consumer
pipe
quoted
transmitted data is written to the output FIFO and the BAM producer
pipe received data is read from the input FIFO.

With BAM capabilities, qup-i2c core can transfer more than
256 bytes, without a 'stop' which is not possible otherwise.

Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <redacted>
Reviewed-by: Andy Gross <redacted>
Tested-by: Archit Taneja <redacted>
Tested-by: Telkar Nagender <redacted>
My code checkers found some issues:

    SPARSE
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qup.c:555:6: warning: symbol 'qup_sg_set_buf'
was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qup.c:1243:50: warning: dubious: !x & !y
    SMATCH
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qup.c:165 qup_sg_set_buf warn: unused return: s
=
sg_next()
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qup.c:165 qup_sg_set_buf warn: unused return: s
=
sg_next()
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qup.c:1243 qup_i2c_xfer_v2() warn: add some
parenthesis here?
    CPPCHECK
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qup.c:1243: style: Boolean result is used in
bitwise operation. Clarify expression with parentheses.
    SPATCH
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qup.c:1380:2-13: WARNING: Assignment of bool to
0/1
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qup.c:1481:1-13: WARNING: Assignment of bool to
0/1
quoted
  CC      drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qup.o
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qup.c:555:6: warning: no previous prototype for
'qup_sg_set_buf' [-Wmissing-prototypes]  void qup_sg_set_buf(struct
scatterlist *sg, void *buf, struct qup_i2c_tag *tg,

Can you fix them and resend??
  Really sorry for the delay ,  sent it here [1]

  Also, while testing this series in one of a new platform, found that an
additional 
  Regression and a fix is required on top of this series. So can I send a
separate fix on top of this series ?


[1]   https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/586125/

Regards,
 Sricharan
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help