[PATCH V3 1/6] stm class: Add ioctl get_options interface
From: alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com (Alexander Shishkin)
Date: 2016-02-12 15:20:19
Also in:
linux-api, lkml
From: alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com (Alexander Shishkin)
Date: 2016-02-12 15:20:19
Also in:
linux-api, lkml
Chunyan Zhang [off-list ref] writes:
There is already an interface of set_options, but no get_options yet. Before setting any options, one would may want to see the current status of that option by means of get_options interface. This interface has been used in CoreSight STM driver.
I'm not sure I understand the reasoning behind this. If a userspace program opens a communication channel and wants to configure certain features on it, why does its choice depend on what has been configured for this channel previously? It can be anything at all. Most likely, it's either unconfigured or configured to its default values, but why does this matter for a new writer? Regards, -- Alex