[PATCH v11 3/4] ARM64: add SBSA Generic Watchdog device node in amd-seattle-soc.dtsi
From: Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com (Suravee Suthikulpanit)
Date: 2016-02-10 20:56:48
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-watchdog, lkml
Hi Fu Wei, On 2/10/16 00:00, fu.wei at linaro.org wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
From: Fu Wei <redacted> This can be a example of adding SBSA Generic Watchdog device node into some dts files for the Soc which contains SBSA Generic Watchdog. Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Fu Wei <redacted> --- arch/arm64/boot/dts/amd/amd-seattle-soc.dtsi | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amd/amd-seattle-soc.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amd/amd-seattle-soc.dtsi index 2874d92..67eb636 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amd/amd-seattle-soc.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amd/amd-seattle-soc.dtsi@@ -84,6 +84,15 @@ clock-names = "uartclk", "apb_pclk"; }; + watchdog0: watchdog at e0bb0000 { + compatible = "arm,sbsa-gwdt"; + reg = <0x0 0xe0bc0000 0 0x1000>, + <0x0 0xe0bb0000 0 0x1000>; + interrupts = <0 337 4>; + timeout-sec = <15>; + status = "disabled";
Could you please remove this status line? I do not think it is necessary for this one here anymore. Thanks, Suravee
+ };
+
spi0: ssp at e1020000 {
status = "disabled";
compatible = "arm,pl022", "arm,primecell";