On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 11:21:57PM +0100, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
Hi Vinod,
Am Montag, 8. Februar 2016, 18:44:19 schrieb Vinod Koul:
quoted
On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 10:27:04AM +0100, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
quoted
Am Montag, 8. Februar 2016, 08:41:34 schrieb Vinod Koul:
quoted
On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 02:56:54PM +0800, Caesar Wang wrote:
quoted
Hello Vinod,
Is there any chance apply the DMA patches?:-)
I was waiting for any ACKs on ARM patches before I merge this series.
I think the more regular way is for the driver maintainer to take the
driver-specific stuff and the devicetree parts going through the
specific arm- tree. But if you really want to take the whole series,
for patches 4,5,6
Yes but that causes cross tree dependencies, which looking at this won't
be a big problem, so I can safely merge dmaengine changes and rest can go
thru ARM tree.
Typically submitter should say which tree he/she prefers, which was not
provided..
So, are all okay to merge the entire series thru dmaengine tree or
independent. I don't mind either
In general I don't mind either solution, but would prefer me taking the 3
"ARM: dts: foo" patches, while the rest would go through your tree.
Main reason is to prevent any possible conflicts with other Rockchip
devicetree additions also going into 4.6 .
Sounds good, will queue them up
--
~Vinod