Thread (45 messages) 45 messages, 6 authors, 2016-03-01

[PATCH v3 3/3] pci: dra7xx: use pdata callbacks to perform reset

From: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <hidden>
Date: 2016-02-05 04:20:37
Also in: linux-omap, lkml

Hi Paul,

On Tuesday 02 February 2016 04:10 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
Hi,

On Friday 29 January 2016 12:01 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
quoted
* Suman Anna [off-list ref] [160127 15:17]:
quoted
On 01/27/2016 12:56 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
quoted
* Suman Anna [off-list ref] [160127 10:17]:
quoted
On 01/27/2016 11:31 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
quoted
Why do you need another reset here? Can't you just implement PM runtime
in the driver and do the usual pm_runtime_put_sync followed by
pm_runtime_disable?
The omap_hwmod_enable/disable code does not deal with hardresets (PRCM
reset lines) and so the pm_runtime_get_sync/put_sync only end up dealing
with clocks, and we need to invoke the reset functions separately.
Modules with softresets in SYSCONFIG are ok, as they are dealt with
properly.
Hmm _reset() in omap_hwmod.c has this to call _assert_hardreset:

	if (oh->class->reset) {
		r = oh->class->reset(oh);
	} else {
		if (oh->rst_lines_cnt > 0) {
			for (i = 0; i < oh->rst_lines_cnt; i++)
				_assert_hardreset(oh, oh->rst_lines[i].name);
			return 0;
		} else {
			r = _ocp_softreset(oh);
			if (r == -ENOENT)
				r = 0;
		}
	}
Right, hwmod code does the initial reset.
quoted
Care to explain what exactly the problem with the hwmod code not doing
the reset on init?
And we only need to deassert the reset in probe. Technically, we don't
need to assert first and deassert in probe, and that was a design choice
made by Kishon.
OK so if hwmod code has already done the reset, then why would you need
to deassert reset in the device driver probe?
The hwmod code only asserts the reset lines and that is not enough to access
the PCI registers. The reset lines must be de-asserted before accessing the
PCIe registers.
quoted
quoted
quoted
And why do you need to do another reset in dra7xx_pcie_remove()?
Primarily to restore the reset state back to what it was after the
driver remove gets called. We cannot call deassert twice without calling
a assert in between. Kishon had originally added the assert and deassert
only in probe, but nothing in remove, they ought to be deassert in probe
and assert in remove to match initial hardware state, and to also make
it work across multiple probe/remove.
right. I thought if some program like the bootloader requires the reset lines
to be in initial hw state, then it might break on 'reboot'. So restored it back
to the initial hw state.
quoted
I don't understand this part either.. Usually you just power up and init
the registers to a sane state in a device driver probe and on exit just
power down the device.
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
Basically I'm wondering how come we need these platform data callbacks
at all.
The hardresets are controlled through the
omap_device_assert(deassert)_hardreset functions, and since these are
limited to mach-omap2, we are invoking them through platform data callbacks.
Right.. But I'm wondering about the why you need to do this in the
driver at all part :)
The initial reset at init time is okay, but hwmod _enable() bails out if
the resets lines are asserted. This was a change made long time back, I
believe to deal with the problems around the DSP enabling sequences. As
such, pm_runtime_get_sync() and put_sync() do not deassert and assert
the resets.
OK if the hwmod code does not deassert reset lines properly on enable,
then that sounds like a bug that should be fixed instead of adding
device specific work arounds.
I think some devices require the reset lines to be asserted and some devices
require it to be de-asserted and hwmod was designed when there was only the
first type of devices. I'm not sure though.
quoted
Sorry to keep dragging this on a bit longer, but I think we need to
hear Paul's comments on this one.
I agree.
Paul, what do you think is the best way forward to perform reset?
Can you give your feedback as we are at the risk of PCIe driver being removed?

Thanks
Kishon
Thanks
Kishon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help