[PATCH 1/5] all: s390: move wrapper infrastructure to generic headers

On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 11:41:56PM +0300, Yury Norov wrote:

On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 08:54:34PM +0100, Heiko Carstens wrote:

quoted

So I think I can summarize my point to: if you can enforce correctness, why
shouldn't you do it if the performance impact is only a single instruction.

For aarch64 it's 5 instructions. But what's more important (if ever),
another wrapper takes another i-cache line...
        <compat_SyS_ftruncate>:
        stp     x29, x30, [sp,#-16]!
        mov     x29, sp
        bl      d40 <do_sys_ftruncate.constprop.3>
        ldp     x29, x30, [sp],#16
        ret

Why does gcc allocate a stackframe here? Don't you have tail call
optimization?