[PATCH v2 10/21] arm64: KVM: VHE: Split save/restore of sysregs shared between EL1 and EL2
From: Marc Zyngier <hidden>
Date: 2016-02-02 16:19:49
Also in:
kvm, kvmarm, lkml
On 02/02/16 15:46, Christoffer Dall wrote:
On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 09:46:05AM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:quoted
On 01/02/16 13:54, Christoffer Dall wrote:quoted
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 03:53:44PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:quoted
A handful of system registers are still shared between EL1 and EL2, even while using VHE. These are tpidr*_el[01], actlr_el1, sp0, elr, and spsr.So by shared registers you mean registers that do both have an EL0/1 version as well as an EL2 version, but where accesses aren't rewritten transparently?No, I mean that these registers do *not* have a separate banked version. There is only a single set of registers, which have to be save/restored the old way.huh, ARMv8 clearly specifies the existence of TPIDR_EL0, TPIDR_EL1, and TPIDR_EL2, for example. I cannot seem to find anywhere in the VHE spec that says that the TPIDR_EL2 goes away. I'm confused now.
Nothing goes away, but these registers do not get renamed either. For example, TPIDR_EL1 doesn't magically access TPIDR_EL2 when running at EL2+VHE, and there is no TPIDR_EL12 accessor either. So TPIDR_EL1 is effectively "shared" between host and guest, and must be save/restored (note that the host kernel still uses TIPDR_EL1 even when running with VHE, and that KVM still uses TPIDR_EL2 to cache the current vcpu).
quoted
quoted
also, by sp0 do you mean sp_el0, and by elr you mean elr_el1, and by spsr you mean spsr_el1 ?sp0 -> sp_el0 indeed. elr and spsr really are the guest PC and PSTATE, so I should really reword this commit message, it is utterly confusing.I guess I don't understand the definition of a 'shared' register given your comments here...
Does this make it clearer? Thanks, M. -- Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...