On 2/1/2016 11:29 AM, Eric Auger wrote:

quoted

hanks, we should ask Baptiste to get his email into the Maintainer file list.

I think it is:
./scripts/get_maintainer.pl
0001-vfio-platform-add-support-for-ACPI-while-detecting-t.patch

Baptiste Reynal [off-list ref] (maintainer:VFIO
PLATFORM DRIVER,commit_signer:1/5=20%)
Alex Williamson [off-list ref] (maintainer:VFIO
DRIVER,commit_signer:2/3=67%,commit_signer:4/5=80%)
../..

Strange, I'll reset my tree. 

quoted

quoted

quoted

quoted

On my side I tested with of amd xgbe and I don't observe any regression.

Best Regards

Can I add your tested by?

Well to make things clear I did not test the ACPI part. I just can tell
this does not bring any regression on the of part. But I am not against
if you don't find anybody else and you tested the ACPI part ;-)

How about?

of-tested-by: ...

Shanker and I tested ACPI before pushing the patches to the list and we also 
posted the corresponding QEMU patches as well to the qemu-devel maillist.

http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/575878/

I'll ask him to add his acpi-tested-by for the ACPI part.

Best Regards

-- 
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project