Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2016-02-01

[PATCH net 5/6] net: mvneta: The mvneta_percpu_elect function should be atomic

From: Gregory CLEMENT <hidden>
Date: 2016-02-01 10:23:10
Also in: lkml, netdev

Hi David,
 
 On sam., janv. 30 2016, David Miller [off-list ref] wrote:
From: Gregory CLEMENT <redacted>
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 17:26:06 +0100
quoted
@@ -370,6 +370,8 @@ struct mvneta_port {
 	struct net_device *dev;
 	struct notifier_block cpu_notifier;
 	int rxq_def;
+	/* protect  */
+	spinlock_t lock;
 
 	/* Core clock */
 	struct clk *clk;
Protect what?  This comment needs a lot of improvement.
Sorry about it, this was a left-over.
Everyone knows a spinlock "protects" things, so if you aren't going
to actually describe what this lock protects, and in what contexts
the lock is used, you might as well not say anything at all.
I can only agree with you, I will fix it for next version.

Thanks,

Gregory


-- 
Gregory Clement, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help