Arnd Bergmann [off-list ref] writes:
On Friday 29 January 2016 16:25:30 Robert Jarzmik wrote:
quoted
Arnd Bergmann [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
These are all fixes for harmless warnings, aside from the first
patch, which is a cleanup. Please pick them up into the PXA
tree (my preference), or provide an Ack so I can put them
into arm-soc.
Hi Arnd,
I'll pick them up, provided the acks (for clock tree for example). The
pxa-for-4.6 will happen.
I'll just have a check on 1/9 to verify nobody hides in a corner a direct CKEN
access, and try to understand more thoroughly 7/9, all the others look good to
me.
Ok, sounds good. If you are unsure about it, you can also drop that
one or do a broader version of it that does the other registers as well.
I don't think it caused any compiler warnings, which is what I'm trying
to handle right now.
You're right, I checked and it's good. tc-arm.c in gcc is a good lecture.
I'll queue 1/9 up to 8/9 in pxa/for-next, thanks.
Cheers.
--
Robert