On 29 January 2016 at 17:00, Matt Fleming [off-list ref] wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jan, at 10:36:03AM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
quoted
On 28 January 2016 at 23:58, Matt Fleming [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Would it make more sense to #undef __init in one of the arm64 efistub
header files? I'm thinking of the case where some poor unsuspecting
developer writes a new function and marks it as __init, and we miss it
during review.
Yes, I can add it to efistub.h, and make sure it gets included in all the files
Should we #undef it and #define it to a string that is easily grep'ed
for, so it is easy to find the explanatory comment that goes along
with it?
E.g.,
#define __init __init_not_supported_in_efi_stub
This would produce a compilation failure if someone tags something as
__init right? Looks fine to me.
Yes, but it makes the error message difficult to decipher, since
__init is printed and not what it resolves to. Locally, I tried this,
which seems to work:
#undef __init
#define __init __attribute__((__init_not_supported_in_efi_stub))
#pragma GCC diagnostic error "-Wattributes"
which produces
CC drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/arm-stub.o
/home/ard/linux-2.6/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/arm-stub.c:24:1:
error: ?__init_not_supported_in_efi_stub? attribute directive ignored
[-Werror=attributes]
{
^
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
which is slightly dodgy, but at least puts the string right in the error message