Thread (16 messages) 16 messages, 5 authors, 2016-01-20

How to get better precision out of getrusage on the ARM?

flat view

From: Patrick Doyle <hidden>
Date: 2016-01-19 14:19:45

Hello Alexandre,
I missed that patch.  I'll have to take a look at that.  Thank you.

Regardless, it seems that I need to modify tcb_clksrc.c to register
itself through CLOCKSOURCE_OF_DECLARE(), set the appropriate kernel
configuration options, and use clock_gettime(CLOCK_THREAD_CPUTIME_ID)
in order to get better than 1 tick resolution out of clock_gettime for
my threads.  Unfortunately, the tcb_clksrc.c modifications appear to
be incompatible with the design intent of atmel_tclib.c.  I am waiting
for the opportunity to talk to Atmel about this.  (I need to ping my
local FAE about this again).  I also need to turn up the heat on this
back burner'ed task.  (I got some numbers, none of us are happy with
them, and I need to see what I can do to get better numbers, when I
can make the time to do so.)

--wpd


On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 7:16 PM, Alexandre Belloni
[off-list ref] wrote:
Hi Patrick,

I was wondering whether you had the chance to test this patch from the
RT tree:
http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/rt/linux-rt-devel.git/commit/?h=v4.4-rt2&id=57142bdff523a67657d0b2603eaa91df58b88bd8

when trying your sched_clock experiment?

On 30/12/2015 at 10:00:46 -0500, Patrick Doyle wrote :
quoted
Continuing on...
I now have a CLOCKSOURCE_OF_DECLARED()'ed 10 MHz clock source running
on my ARM processor (Atmel SAMA5D2 Xplained board).  It registers
itself through sched_clock_register() to provide a high resolution
sched clock.  Once I turned on "Full dynticks CPU time accounting"
(CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_GEN), I was able to get better than jiffy
resolution from my calls to getrusage(RUSAGE_THREAD,..).  But things
still aren't quite right.  I am using getrusage() to provide some
runtime profile information to an existing application (that was
ported to run on Linux instead of a custom RTOS).  I have code that
looks like:

tick()
// commented out code that used to do something
tock()

where tick() & tock() are my profile "start" and "stop" points that
call getrusage() to record and and accumulate time spent between calls
to tick() & tock().  Most of the time, I get a delta of 0 between the
two calls, which I expect.  But occasionally, I get a delta ranging
between 800us and 1000us, which I don't understand at all.  It seems
like my thread is being "charged" for time spent doing something else.
Perhaps an interrupt occurred and its time got charged to my thread;
perhaps a higher priority thread ran for 1ms, I don't know (yet).

Does anybody have any suggestions as to where I might look, or as to
what kernel CONFIG options might make the most sense for an
application such as this?

--wpd

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
--
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help