Thread (9 messages) 9 messages, 2 authors, 2016-01-06

[PATCH 1/2] arm64: add macro to handle large immediates

flat view
STALE3934d

From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland)
Date: 2016-01-06 12:21:04

On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 12:15:14PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On 6 January 2016 at 12:05, Mark Rutland [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Sometimes we want to be able to load values greater than 0xff into a
register, without placing said values in a literal pool. Arranging for
the value to be split up across a number of movz and movk instructions
is tedious and error-prone.

Following the example of {adr,str,ldr}_l, this patch adds a new mov_l
macro which can be used to load immediate values of up to 64 bits into a
register.

Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <redacted>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <redacted>
Cc: Will Deacon <redacted>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h | 13 +++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h
index 12eff92..64fd0a2 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h
@@ -193,6 +193,19 @@ lr .req    x30             // link register
        str     \src, [\tmp, :lo12:\sym]
        .endm

+       /*
+        * Move a large immediate up to 64-bits.
+        *
+        * @dst: destination register (64 bit wide)
+        * @val: value
+        */
+       .macro  mov_l, dst, val
+       movz    \dst, :abs_g0_nc:\val
+       movk    \dst, :abs_g1_nc:\val
+       movk    \dst, :abs_g2_nc:\val
+       movk    \dst, :abs_g3:\val
+       .endm
+
Ack for the general idea, but for correctness, you should pair the
movk instructions with the _nc relocations (i.e., keep movz first, but
invert the order of the relocs)
Ah, I hadn't spotted the restriction. I'll change that to:

	movz	\dst, :abs_g3:\val
	movk	\dst, :abs_g2:\val
	movk	\dst, :abs_g1:\val
	movk	\dst, :abs_g0:\val

That raises a related question. Is it the linker's responsibility to
fill in the shift encoding in the hw field as part of the g{3,2,1}
relocs?

Mine seems to, but I don't know if that's strictly required or correct
as the AArrch64 ELF spec only mentions the immediate field for *ABS_G*,
and the shift is encoded in hw rather than imm16.

Thanks,
Mark.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help