On 28/01/2016 at 00:33:47 -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote :
On 01/27, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
quoted
@@ -399,13 +400,33 @@ static void __init at91_pm_sram_init(void)
&at91_pm_suspend_in_sram, at91_pm_suspend_in_sram_sz);
}
+static __initconst struct of_device_id atmel_pmc_ids[] = {
The kbuild error is weird, but __initconst should come right
before the equals sign (=). Plus it should actually be const.
Yeah, I sent v5, right after v4. I had that change but forgot to squash
it.
quoted
+ { .compatible = "atmel,at91rm9200-pmc" },
+ { .compatible = "atmel,at91sam9260-pmc" },
+ { .compatible = "atmel,at91sam9g45-pmc" },
+ { .compatible = "atmel,at91sam9n12-pmc" },
+ { .compatible = "atmel,at91sam9x5-pmc" },
+ { .compatible = "atmel,sama5d3-pmc" },
+ { .compatible = "atmel,sama5d2-pmc" },
+ { /* sentinel */ },
+};
+
static void __init at91_pm_init(void)
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com