Thread (5 messages) 5 messages, 3 authors, 2016-01-21

[PATCH] soc: mediatek: PMIC wrap: clear the STAUPD_TRIG bit of WDT_SRC_EN

From: Daniel Kurtz <hidden>
Date: 2016-01-20 10:32:50
Also in: linux-mediatek, lkml

On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 8:52 PM, Henry Chen [off-list ref] wrote:
Since STAUPD interrupts aren't handled on mt8173, disable watchdog timeout
monitor of STAUPD to avoid WDT_INT triggered by STAUPD.

Signed-off-by: Henry Chen <redacted>
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
---
 drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c
index af919b1..998f561 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c
@@ -60,6 +60,15 @@
 #define PWRAP_MAN_CMD_OP_OUTD          (0x9 << 8)
 #define PWRAP_MAN_CMD_OP_OUTQ          (0xa << 8)

+/* macro for Watch Dog Timer Source */
+#define PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_STAUPD_TRIG           (1 << 25)
+#define PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_HARB_STAUPD_DLE       (1 << 20)
+#define PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_HARB_STAUPD_ALE       (1 << 6)
+#define PWRAP_WDT_SRC_MASK_ALL                 0xffffffff
+#define PWRAP_WDT_SRC_MASK_NO_STAUPD   ~(PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_STAUPD_TRIG | \
+                                         PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_HARB_STAUPD_DLE | \
+                                         PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_HARB_STAUPD_ALE)
+
 /* macro for slave device wrapper registers */
 #define PWRAP_DEW_BASE                 0xbc00
 #define PWRAP_DEW_EVENT_OUT_EN         (PWRAP_DEW_BASE + 0x0)
@@ -830,7 +839,7 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, of_pwrap_match_tbl);

 static int pwrap_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
-       int ret, irq;
+       int ret, irq, wdt_src;
        struct pmic_wrapper *wrp;
        struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
        const struct of_device_id *of_id =
@@ -920,7 +929,13 @@ static int pwrap_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)

        /* Initialize watchdog, may not be done by the bootloader */
        pwrap_writel(wrp, 0xf, PWRAP_WDT_UNIT);
-       pwrap_writel(wrp, 0xffffffff, PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN);
+       /*
+        * Since STAUPD was not used on mt8173 platform,
+        * so STAUPD of WDT_SRC which should be turned off
+        */
It is a little awkward that "!pwrap_is_mt8135(wrp)" means mt8173.  Is
this always true?
Why aren't we clearing STAUPD for mt8135 too?
I assume it is because mt8135 does not define this bit?
What about other devices that are not mt8135 or mt8173?

Perhaps change the comment to:
"This driver does not use STAUPD, so clear this WDT SRC for all
devices for which it exists to avoid unhandled interrupts"

Other than that, this patch is:
Reviewed-by: Daniel Kurtz <redacted>
+       wdt_src = pwrap_is_mt8135(wrp) ?
+                       PWRAP_WDT_SRC_MASK_ALL : PWRAP_WDT_SRC_MASK_NO_STAUPD;
+       pwrap_writel(wrp, wdt_src, PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN);
        pwrap_writel(wrp, 0x1, PWRAP_TIMER_EN);
        pwrap_writel(wrp, ~((1 << 31) | (1 << 1)), PWRAP_INT_EN);

--
1.8.1.1.dirty
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help