[RESEND PATCH 0/2] crypto: sunxi-ss: fix 64-bit compilation
flat view
From: clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com (Corentin LABBE)
Date: 2016-01-16 20:32:52
Also in:
linux-crypto, lkml
Le 08/01/2016 12:24, Andre Przywara a ?crit :
(resending to add linux-crypto, patches unchanged) Hi, these two patches provide a different approach to an issue I tried to fix lately [1]. Instead of casting everything I now promote local types to size_t, so that the min3() arguments naturally match in type. As size_t is defined as "unsigned int" on 32-bit architectures anyway, that actually does not change anything there, but instead provides a clean approach to get it compiled for arm64. I split this up because 1/2 seems much cleaner to me than 2/2, so we can have a separate discussion/merge process on this. Cheers, Andre. [1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-December/395689.html Andre Przywara (2): crypto: sunxi-ss-cipher: promote variables to match types in min3() calls crypto: sunxi-ss-hash: promote variables to match types in min3() calls drivers/crypto/sunxi-ss/sun4i-ss-cipher.c | 20 ++++++++++---------- drivers/crypto/sunxi-ss/sun4i-ss-hash.c | 12 ++++++------ drivers/crypto/sunxi-ss/sun4i-ss.h | 2 +- 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
Hello Sorry for this late answer. I am in trouble with those patch, so we have with Andre a long conversation about it. Basically, sun4i-ss will never be available on 64bits platform. (A64 will have a totally new crypto engine). So letting it to compile under 64bit arch is only useful when goal is to add COMPILE_TEST for it. But COMPILE_TEST cannot simply be added with those patch since some arches (x86/x86_64 at least) does not have writesl/readsl available. The conclusion is that it is simpler to block 64bit build for sun4i-ss. Regards LABBE Corentin