Cyrille Pitchen [off-list ref] writes:
Hi Mans,
I've tried to apply your patch on a next-20160112 branch to test it but it
failed. I've also looked at the for-next branch of the SPI sub-system git
tree.
It seems that one issue occurred within a chunk patching the atmel_spi_setup()
function. Please see below.
Le 11/01/2016 17:01, Mans Rullgard a ?crit :
[...]
quoted
diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-atmel.c b/drivers/spi/spi-atmel.c
index 08cbb3e43c76..d4a806e24060 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-atmel.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-atmel.c
[...]
quoted
@@ -1603,6 +1611,7 @@ static int atmel_spi_setup(struct spi_device *spi)
}
asd->npcs_pin = npcs_pin;
+ asd->use_cs_gpio = use_cs_gpio;
spi->controller_state = asd;
} else {
atmel_spi_lock(as);
[...]
There is no 'else' statement in the source code I'm looking at.
Sorry, I'll send a new patch against the correct base. I forgot I had
something else earlier in my local branch.
--
M?ns Rullg?rd