Thread (14 messages) 14 messages, 3 authors, 2016-01-10

[PATCH 1/3] checkpatch.pl: add missing memory barriers

From: mst@redhat.com (Michael S. Tsirkin)
Date: 2016-01-10 11:42:46
Also in: linux-arch, linux-mips, linux-s390, linux-sh, linux-um, linuxppc-dev, lkml, sparclinux, virtualization

On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 02:15:50PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
On Mon, 2016-01-04 at 22:45 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
quoted
On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 08:07:40AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
quoted
On Mon, 2016-01-04 at 13:36 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
quoted
SMP-only barriers were missing in checkpatch.pl

Refactor code slightly to make adding more variants easier.

Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
---
?scripts/checkpatch.pl | 9 ++++++++-
?1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
index 2b3c228..0245bbe 100755
--- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
+++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
@@ -5116,7 +5116,14 @@ sub process {
?			}
?		}
?# check for memory barriers without a comment.
-		if ($line =~ /\b(mb|rmb|wmb|read_barrier_depends|smp_mb|smp_rmb|smp_wmb|smp_read_barrier_depends)\(/) {
+
+		my @barriers = ('mb', 'rmb', 'wmb', 'read_barrier_depends');
+		my @smp_barriers = ('smp_store_release', 'smp_load_acquire', 'smp_store_mb');
+
+		@smp_barriers = (@smp_barriers, map {"smp_" . $_} @barriers);
I think using map, which so far checkpatch doesn't use,
makes smp_barriers harder to understand and it'd be
better to enumerate them.
Okay - I'll rewrite using foreach.
I think using the qr form (like 'our $Attribute' and
a bunch of others) is the general style that should
be used for checkpatch.
Thanks - that's what I did in the new version (included in
v3 of the arch cleanup patchset now).
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help