[PATCH v2 17/32] arm: define __smp_xxx
From: mst@redhat.com (Michael S. Tsirkin)
Date: 2016-01-05 14:39:10
Also in:
linux-arch, linux-mips, linux-s390, linux-sh, linux-um, linuxppc-dev, lkml, sparclinux, virtualization
On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 01:59:34PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 02:54:20PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:quoted
On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 02:36:58PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:quoted
On Sun, Jan 03, 2016 at 11:12:44AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:quoted
On Sat, Jan 02, 2016 at 11:24:38AM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:quoted
quoted
My only concern is that it gives people an additional handle onto a "new" set of barriers - just because they're prefixed with __* unfortunately doesn't stop anyone from using it (been there with other arch stuff before.) I wonder whether we should consider making the smp memory barriers inline functions, so these __smp_xxx() variants can be undef'd afterwards, thereby preventing drivers getting their hands on these new macros?That'd be tricky to do cleanly since asm-generic depends on ifndef to add generic variants where needed. But it would be possible to add a checkpatch test for this.Wasn't the whole purpose of these things for 'drivers' (namely virtio/xen hypervisor interaction) to use these?Ah, I see, you add virt_*mb() stuff later on for that use case. So, assuming everybody does include asm-generic/barrier.h, you could simply #undef the __smp version at the end of that, once we've generated all the regular primitives from it, no?Not so simple - that's why I mentioned using inline functions. The new smp_* _macros_ are: +#define smp_mb() __smp_mb() which means if we simply #undef __smp_mb(), smp_mb() then points at something which is no longer available, and we'll end up with errors saying that __smp_mb() doesn't exist. My suggestion was to change: #ifndef smp_mb #define smp_mb() __smp_mb() #endif to: #ifndef smp_mb static inline void smp_mb(void) { __smp_mb(); } #endif which then means __smp_mb() and friends can be #undef'd afterwards.
Absolutely, I got it.
The issue is that e.g. tile has:
#define __smp_mb__after_atomic() do { } while (0)
and this is cheaper than barrier().
For this reason I left
#define smp_mb__after_atomic() __smp_mb__after_atomic()
in place there.
Now, of course I can do (in asm-generic):
#ifndef smp_mb__after_atomic
static inline void smp_mb__after_atomic(void)
{
...
}
#endif
but this seems ugly: architectures do defines, generic
version does inline.
And that is not all: APIs like smp_store_mb can take
a variety of types as arguments so they pretty much
must be implemented as macros.
Teaching checkpatch.pl to complain about it seems like the cleanest
approach.
-- RMK's Patch system: http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up according to speedtest.net.