On Tue, 2015-12-29 at 13:48 +0000, Vladimir Murzin wrote:

On 28/12/15 22:23, Ben Hutchings wrote:

[...]

quoted

I've never needed to use a web-based system to submit kernel patches
before, and I'm not going to start now.??Someone else can re-submit

You don't have to... I just quote Catalin's recipe [1]

quoted

You can send patches as usual to patches at arm.linux.org.uk, just add
KernelVersion: v3.?? after the --- line in your patch (maybe this could
be automate as well but I didn't bother).

For series, because the arrival order is not guaranteed, I use the git
alias below to trick it into sleeping 60s between patches:

ksend-rmk-patch = !git send-email --annotate --no-thread --suppress-cc=all --to-cmd='sleep 60 && echo patches at arm.linux.org.uk "#"'

For stgit, I have a dedicated template:

From: %(sender)s
To: patches at arm.linux.org.uk
Subject: %(prefix)s%(shortdescr)s

%(longdescr)s
PATCH FOLLOWS
KernelVersion:%(version)s
%(diff)s

And there is always git pull request that Russell is happy with.

Does it work for you?

[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/8/22/228

Thanks.  Jungseung Lee has already re-submitted this patch, though.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
If God had intended Man to program,
we'd have been born with serial I/O ports.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 811 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20151229/015636b9/attachment.sig>