[RESEND PATCH v1 3/4] net: ethernet: arc: Add support emac for RK3036
From: heiko@sntech.de (Heiko Stübner)
Date: 2015-12-29 23:32:15
Also in:
linux-rockchip, lkml, netdev
From: heiko@sntech.de (Heiko Stübner)
Date: 2015-12-29 23:32:15
Also in:
linux-rockchip, lkml, netdev
Am Dienstag, 29. Dezember 2015, 14:59:59 schrieb Florian Fainelli:
On December 27, 2015 11:22:20 PM PST, Xing Zheng [off-list ref]
wrote:
quoted
The RK3036's GRFs offset are different with RK3066/RK3188, and need to set mac TX/RX clock before probe emac. Signed-off-by: Xing Zheng <redacted> ---<snip>quoted
}; static const struct of_device_id emac_rockchip_dt_ids[] = { - { .compatible = "rockchip,rk3066-emac", .data = &emac_rockchip_dt_data[0] }, - { .compatible = "rockchip,rk3188-emac", .data = &emac_rockchip_dt_data[1] }, + { .compatible = "rockchip,rk3036-emac", .data = &emac_rockchip_dt_data[0] }, + { .compatible = "rockchip,rk3066-emac", .data = &emac_rockchip_dt_data[1] }, + { .compatible = "rockchip,rk3188-emac", .data = &emac_rockchip_dt_data[2] }, { /* Sentinel */ }Food for thought, you might want to use an enum here to index emac_rockchip_dt_data which would be less error prone if you add/remove entries in this structure.
Or just have the structs separately and not in array-form at all, aka rk3066_emac_dt_data, rk3036_emac_dt_data. I don't think the original array really improves anything.