On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 1:32 AM, Ohad Ben-Cohen [off-list ref] wrote:

On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Lee Jones [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Thu, 26 Nov 2015, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:

quoted

On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 3:14 PM, Lee Jones [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

ST's platforms often have multiple co-processors (usually ST40s or ST231s)
on-board.  This provides the Linux-side infrastructure to flash and boot
them successfully.

This set has been tested on an STiH410-B2120.

It would be nice if you could get at least one Reviewed-by tag coming
outside of ST (e.g., Suman or Bjorn who are actively using and
improving remoteproc).

If you require reviews by these guys, shouldn't they be Maintainers?

Additional review isn't a requirement, but it's a plus.

quoted

Please be aware that
the DTS(I) changes are applied to this set for your information only
and are not to be applied through the RemoteProc tree.  The usual
process to which we conform is that Maxime (the STi Maintainer) will
apply the DT changes *after* the main driver has been applied, in this
case by you.

Ok, great, so I will not take patches 5 and 6.

I interpreted this as you picked patch 1-4 and didn't pay more
attention to them, but I can't find them in your kernel.org trees. So
I've looked through them again.

Please apply patch 1, 3 and 4 to your tree Ohad. I was unable to find
a v5 of patch 2, but it's unrelated so no need to wait for a new
version of that.

Regards,
Bjorn