Thread (17 messages) 17 messages, 2 authors, 2015-12-08
STALE3849d
Revisions (5)
  1. v5 [diff vs current]
  2. v5 [diff vs current]
  3. v9 current
  4. v9 [diff vs current]
  5. v10 [diff vs current]

[PATCH v9 5/6] target-arm: kvm - re-inject guest debug exceptions

From: Alex Bennée <hidden>
Date: 2015-11-12 16:20:50
Also in: kvm, kvmarm, qemu-arm, qemu-devel
Subsystem: the rest · Maintainer: Linus Torvalds

From: Alex Benn?e <redacted>

If we can't find details for the debug exception in our debug state
then we can assume the exception is due to debugging inside the guest.
To inject the exception into the guest state we re-use the TCG exception
code (do_interupt).

However while guest debugging is in effect we currently can't handle the
guest using single step which is heavily used by GDB.

Signed-off-by: Alex Benn?e <redacted>

---
v5:
  - new for v5
---
 target-arm/helper-a64.c | 12 ++++++++++--
 target-arm/kvm.c        | 27 +++++++++++++++++++--------
 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target-arm/helper-a64.c b/target-arm/helper-a64.c
index deb8dbe..fc3ccdf 100644
--- a/target-arm/helper-a64.c
+++ b/target-arm/helper-a64.c
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
 #include "qemu/bitops.h"
 #include "internals.h"
 #include "qemu/crc32c.h"
+#include "sysemu/kvm.h"
 #include <zlib.h> /* For crc32 */
 
 /* C2.4.7 Multiply and divide */
@@ -469,7 +470,8 @@ void aarch64_cpu_do_interrupt(CPUState *cs)
                   new_el);
     if (qemu_loglevel_mask(CPU_LOG_INT)
         && !excp_is_internal(cs->exception_index)) {
-        qemu_log_mask(CPU_LOG_INT, "...with ESR 0x%" PRIx32 "\n",
+        qemu_log_mask(CPU_LOG_INT, "...with ESR %x/0x%" PRIx32 "\n",
+                      env->exception.syndrome >> ARM_EL_EC_SHIFT,
                       env->exception.syndrome);
     }
 
@@ -535,6 +537,12 @@ void aarch64_cpu_do_interrupt(CPUState *cs)
     aarch64_restore_sp(env, new_el);
 
     env->pc = addr;
-    cs->interrupt_request |= CPU_INTERRUPT_EXITTB;
+
+    qemu_log_mask(CPU_LOG_INT, "...to EL%d PC 0x%" PRIx64 " PSTATE 0x%x\n",
+                  new_el, env->pc, pstate_read(env));
+
+    if (!kvm_enabled()) {
+        cs->interrupt_request |= CPU_INTERRUPT_EXITTB;
+    }
 }
 #endif
diff --git a/target-arm/kvm.c b/target-arm/kvm.c
index 1f57e92..4ac177a 100644
--- a/target-arm/kvm.c
+++ b/target-arm/kvm.c
@@ -529,9 +529,10 @@ static int kvm_handle_debug(CPUState *cs, struct kvm_run *run)
     struct kvm_debug_exit_arch *arch_info = &run->debug.arch;
     int hsr_ec = arch_info->hsr >> ARM_EL_EC_SHIFT;
     ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(cs);
+    CPUClass *cc = CPU_GET_CLASS(cs);
     CPUARMState *env = &cpu->env;
 
-    /* Ensure PC is synchronised */
+    /* Ensure all state is synchronised */
     kvm_cpu_synchronize_state(cs);
 
     switch (hsr_ec) {
@@ -539,7 +540,14 @@ static int kvm_handle_debug(CPUState *cs, struct kvm_run *run)
         if (cs->singlestep_enabled) {
             return true;
         } else {
-            error_report("Came out of SINGLE STEP when not enabled");
+            /*
+             * The kernel should have supressed the guests ability to
+             * single step at this point so something has gone wrong.
+             */
+            error_report("%s: guest single-step while debugging unsupported"
+                         " (%"PRIx64", %"PRIx32")\n",
+                         __func__, env->pc, arch_info->hsr);
+            return false;
         }
         break;
     case EC_AA64_BKPT:
@@ -564,14 +572,17 @@ static int kvm_handle_debug(CPUState *cs, struct kvm_run *run)
     default:
         error_report("%s: unhandled debug exit (%"PRIx32", %"PRIx64")\n",
                      __func__, arch_info->hsr, env->pc);
+        return false;
     }
 
-    /* If we don't handle this it could be it really is for the
-       guest to handle */
-    qemu_log_mask(LOG_UNIMP,
-                  "%s: re-injecting exception not yet implemented"
-                  " (0x%"PRIx32", %"PRIx64")\n",
-                  __func__, hsr_ec, env->pc);
+    /* If we are not handling the debug exception it must belong to
+     * the guest. Let's re-use the existing TCG interrupt code to set
+     * everything up properly
+     */
+    cs->exception_index = EXCP_BKPT;
+    env->exception.syndrome = arch_info->hsr;
+    env->exception.vaddress = arch_info->far;
+    cc->do_interrupt(cs);
 
     return false;
 }
-- 
2.6.3
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help