Thread (10 messages) 10 messages, 3 authors, 2015-12-01

[PATCH v2 2/3] ARM: dts: sun8i: Add Allwinner A83T dtsi

From: Vishnu Patekar <hidden>
Date: 2015-11-29 18:09:39
Also in: linux-devicetree, linux-gpio, lkml

Hello Maxime,
Sorry for delayed response.

On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 4:20 AM, Maxime Ripard
[off-list ref] wrote:
Hi,

On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 07:46:16AM +0800, Vishnu Patekar wrote:
quoted
+     memory {
+             reg = <0x40000000 0x80000000>;
+     };
+
+     timer {
+             compatible = "arm,armv7-timer";
+             interrupts = <GIC_PPI 13 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(4) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>,
+                          <GIC_PPI 14 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(4) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>,
+                          <GIC_PPI 11 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(4) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>,
+                          <GIC_PPI 10 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(4) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>;
Shouldn't the number of CPUs be 8?
Yes, It should be 8, also need to change in gic node to 8 CPUs.
No, smp support till now, still I'll change it in next patch version.
quoted
+             clock-frequency = <24000000>;
+             arm,cpu-registers-not-fw-configured;
+     };
Is there some u-boot support for this SoC yet?
recently, I've posted the v2 of u-boot patch.
If so, both the memory node and the clock-frequency and
arm,cpu-registers-not-fw-configured properties are useless (and
harmful for the latter).
Correct, As, timer support is added in u-boot, I'll remove these two.
quoted
+     soc at 01c00000 {
Please remove the address. It's both wrong and useless.
quoted
+             compatible = "simple-bus";
+             #address-cells = <1>;
+             #size-cells = <1>;
+             ranges;
+
+             gic: interrupt-controller at 01c81000 {
+                     compatible = "arm,cortex-a7-gic", "arm,cortex-a15-gic";
+                     reg = <0x01c81000 0x1000>,
+                           <0x01c82000 0x1000>,
+                           <0x01c84000 0x2000>,
+                           <0x01c86000 0x2000>;
+                     interrupt-controller;
+                     #interrupt-cells = <3>;
+                     interrupts = <GIC_PPI 9 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(4) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH)>;
+             };
+
+             pio: pinctrl at 01c20800 {
+                     compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-a83t-pinctrl";
+                     interrupts = <GIC_SPI 15 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+                     <GIC_SPI 17 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+                     <GIC_SPI 19 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
Please align these lines with the first one, like you did for the
GIC's reg for example.
Okie.
quoted
+                     reg = <0x01c20800 0x400>;
+                     clocks = <&osc24M>;
+                     gpio-controller;
+                     interrupt-controller;
+                     #interrupt-cells = <3>;
+                     #gpio-cells = <3>;
+
+                     i2c0_pins_a: i2c0 at 0 {
+                             allwinner,pins = "PH0", "PH1";
+                             allwinner,function = "i2c0";
+                             allwinner,drive = <SUN4I_PINCTRL_10_MA>;
+                             allwinner,pull = <SUN4I_PINCTRL_NO_PULL>;
+                     };
+
+                     i2c1_pins_a: i2c1 at 0 {
+                             allwinner,pins = "PH2", "PH3";
+                             allwinner,function = "i2c1";
+                             allwinner,drive = <SUN4I_PINCTRL_10_MA>;
+                             allwinner,pull = <SUN4I_PINCTRL_NO_PULL>;
+                     };
+
+                     i2c2_pins_a: i2c2 at 0 {
+                             allwinner,pins = "PH4", "PH5";
+                             allwinner,function = "i2c2";
+                             allwinner,drive = <SUN4I_PINCTRL_10_MA>;
+                             allwinner,pull = <SUN4I_PINCTRL_NO_PULL>;
+                     };
+
+                     mmc0_pins_a: mmc0 at 0 {
+                             allwinner,pins = "PF0", "PF1", "PF2",
+                                              "PF3", "PF4", "PF5";
+                             allwinner,function = "mmc0";
+                             allwinner,drive = <SUN4I_PINCTRL_30_MA>;
+                             allwinner,pull = <SUN4I_PINCTRL_NO_PULL>;
+                     };
+
+                     mmc1_pins_a: mmc1 at 0 {
+                             allwinner,pins = "PG0", "PG1", "PG2",
+                                              "PG3", "PG4", "PG5";
+                             allwinner,function = "mmc1";
+                             allwinner,drive = <SUN4I_PINCTRL_30_MA>;
+                             allwinner,pull = <SUN4I_PINCTRL_NO_PULL>;
+                     };
+
+                     mmc2_8bit_pins: mmc2_8bit {
+                             allwinner,pins = "PC5", "PC6", "PC8",
+                                              "PC9", "PC10", "PC11",
+                                              "PC12", "PC13", "PC14",
+                                              "PC15";
+                             allwinner,function = "mmc2";
+                             allwinner,drive = <SUN4I_PINCTRL_30_MA>;
+                             allwinner,pull = <SUN4I_PINCTRL_NO_PULL>;
+                     };
+
+                     uart0_pins_a: uart0 at 0 {
+                             allwinner,pins = "PF2", "PF4";
+                             allwinner,function = "uart0";
+                             allwinner,drive = <SUN4I_PINCTRL_10_MA>;
+                             allwinner,pull = <SUN4I_PINCTRL_NO_PULL>;
+                     };
+
+                     uart0_pins_b: uart0 at 1 {
+                             allwinner,pins = "PB9", "PB10";
+                             allwinner,function = "uart0";
+                             allwinner,drive = <SUN4I_PINCTRL_10_MA>;
+                             allwinner,pull = <SUN4I_PINCTRL_NO_PULL>;
+                     };
Are you going to use all these options?
Not, only uart0_pins_a and uart0_pins_b and mmc0_pins_a will be used for now.
As, these are not enabled, I don't see any harm in keeping those here.

Let me know in case you want to remove, I'll do it.
Thanks!
Maxime

--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help