Thread (13 messages) 13 messages, 3 authors, 2015-11-26

[PATCH v2 net 1/6] net: mvneta: add configuration for MBUS windows access protection

From: Marcin Wojtas <hidden>
Date: 2015-11-26 18:31:54
Also in: lkml, netdev, stable

Hi Thomas,

2015-11-26 19:25 GMT+01:00 Thomas Petazzoni
[off-list ref]:
Marcin,

On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 19:08:08 +0100, Marcin Wojtas wrote:
quoted
This commit adds missing configuration of MBUS windows access protection
in mvneta_conf_mbus_windows function - a dedicated variable for that
purpose remained there unused since v3.8 initial mvneta support. Because
of that the register contents were inherited from the bootloader.

Signed-off-by: Marcin Wojtas <redacted>
Reviewed-by: Gregory CLEMENT <redacted>
Cc: <redacted> # v3.8+
Fixes: c5aff18204da ("net: mvneta: driver for Marvell Armada 370/XP network
unit")
Is this actually fixing a user visible problem? If not, then I am not
sure it qualifies for stable.
Indeed, it's not fixing a visible thing, unless you resume from
suspend to ram. However, the original driver declares and updates
'win_protect ' variable, which have remained unused for past 3 years:)
If you think it's not worth cc'ing stable despite that, I will remove
the notification.
quoted
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
index e84c7f2..c4327b9 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
@@ -62,6 +62,7 @@
 #define MVNETA_WIN_SIZE(w)                      (0x2204 + ((w) << 3))
 #define MVNETA_WIN_REMAP(w)                     (0x2280 + ((w) << 2))
 #define MVNETA_BASE_ADDR_ENABLE                 0x2290
+#define MVNETA_ACCESS_PROTECT_ENABLE         0x2294
Spaces are used for indentation in the definitions of all other
constants in this driver, so I think you should stick with this
convention, at least to remain consistent.
Ok.
quoted
 #define MVNETA_PORT_CONFIG                      0x2400
 #define      MVNETA_UNI_PROMISC_MODE            BIT(0)
 #define      MVNETA_DEF_RXQ(q)                  ((q) << 1)
@@ -3188,9 +3189,11 @@ static void mvneta_conf_mbus_windows(struct mvneta_port *pp,

              win_enable &= ~(1 << i);
              win_protect |= 3 << (2 * i);
+
Unneeded change.
Indeed, my mistake.

Thanks,
Marcin
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help