Thread (16 messages) 16 messages, 3 authors, 2015-12-18

[PATCH v6 8/9] ARM: EXYNOS: rearrange static and non-static functions of PMU driver

From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <hidden>
Date: 2015-11-20 05:10:51
Also in: linux-pm, linux-samsung-soc, lkml

On 20.11.2015 13:46, Manish Badarkhe wrote:
On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 11:35 AM, Pankaj Dubey [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
This patch moves exynos_sys_powerdown_conf function above all
static functions, to avoid confusion causing due to mixing of
static-nonstatic-static functions and to improve readability of this
driver.

Signed-off-by: Pankaj Dubey <redacted>
Suggested-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <redacted>
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <redacted>
---
 arch/arm/mach-exynos/pmu.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++-----------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pmu.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pmu.c
index 01cb649..a7741d4 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pmu.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pmu.c
@@ -39,23 +39,6 @@ u32 pmu_raw_readl(u32 offset)
        return readl_relaxed(pmu_base_addr + offset);
 }

-static void exynos_power_off(void)
-{
-       unsigned int tmp;
-
-       pr_info("Power down.\n");
-       tmp = pmu_raw_readl(EXYNOS_PS_HOLD_CONTROL);
-       tmp ^= (1 << 8);
-       pmu_raw_writel(tmp, EXYNOS_PS_HOLD_CONTROL);
-
-       /* Wait a little so we don't give a false warning below */
-       mdelay(100);
-
-       pr_err("Power down failed, please power off system manually.\n");
-       while (1)
-               ;
-}
-
 void exynos_sys_powerdown_conf(enum sys_powerdown mode)
 {
        unsigned int i;
@@ -85,6 +68,23 @@ void exynos_sys_powerdown_conf(enum sys_powerdown mode)
        }
 }

+static void exynos_power_off(void)
+{
+       unsigned int tmp;
+
+       pr_info("Power down.\n");
+       tmp = pmu_raw_readl(EXYNOS_PS_HOLD_CONTROL);
+       tmp ^= (1 << 8);
Can we have some define over here? to operate this bit.
1. This will be removed by syscon-reboot/poweroff patches [0].
2. This patch is only rename/move. Fixing stuff should go to separate
patches. But IMHO fixing is not needed because of 1.

[0] http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg98858.html

Best regards,
Krzysztof
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help