Thread (10 messages) flat view 10 messages, 3 authors, 2015-11-19

[PATCH 2/3] ARM: dts: enable clock support for Broadcom NSP

From: rjui@broadcom.com (Ray Jui)
Date: 2015-11-18 23:58:22
Also in: linux-devicetree, lkml

Would this patch merge properly with the other NSP DT clean up patch + 
I2C DT patch that you worked out internally but have not sent out?

I thought it's going to make the maintainers' life easier if you can 
group DT changes per platform and send them out in the same series.

I also have some inline comments below.

On 11/18/2015 3:13 PM, Jon Mason wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Replace current device tree dummy clocks with real clock support for
Broadcom Northstar Plus SoC

Signed-off-by: Jon Mason <redacted>
---
  arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm-nsp.dtsi | 99 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
  1 file changed, 75 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm-nsp.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm-nsp.dtsi
index 4bcdd28..f85a4f1 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm-nsp.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm-nsp.dtsi
@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@

  #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
  #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
+#include <dt-bindings/clock/bcm-nsp.h>

  #include "skeleton.dtsi"
@@ -42,7 +43,7 @@

  	mpcore {
  		compatible = "simple-bus";
-		ranges = <0x00000000 0x19020000 0x00003000>;
+		ranges = <0x00000000 0x19000000 0x00023000>;
Why does this have anything to do with clocks? Shouldn't it be a 
separate patch?
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
  		#address-cells = <1>;
  		#size-cells = <1>;
@@ -58,32 +59,23 @@
  			};
  		};

-		L2: l2-cache {
-			compatible = "arm,pl310-cache";
-			reg = <0x2000 0x1000>;
-			cache-unified;
-			cache-level = <2>;
-		};
-
-		gic: interrupt-controller at 19021000 {
-			compatible = "arm,cortex-a9-gic";
-			#interrupt-cells = <3>;
-			#address-cells = <0>;
-			interrupt-controller;
-			reg = <0x1000 0x1000>,
-			      <0x0100 0x100>;
+		a9pll: arm_clk at 19000000 {
+			#clock-cells = <0>;
+			compatible = "brcm,nsp-armpll";
+			clocks = <&osc>;
+			reg = <0x00000 0x1000>;
  		};

  		timer at 19020200 {
  			compatible = "arm,cortex-a9-global-timer";
-			reg = <0x0200 0x100>;
+			reg = <0x20200 0x100>;
  			interrupts = <GIC_PPI 11 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
  			clocks = <&periph_clk>;
  		};

  		twd-timer at 19020600 {
  			compatible = "arm,cortex-a9-twd-timer";
-			reg = <0x0600 0x20>;
+			reg = <0x20600 0x20>;
  			interrupts = <GIC_PPI 13 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(2) |
  						  IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH)>;
  			clocks = <&periph_clk>;
@@ -91,11 +83,27 @@

  		twd-watchdog at 19020620 {
  			compatible = "arm,cortex-a9-twd-wdt";
-			reg = <0x0620 0x20>;
+			reg = <0x20620 0x20>;
  			interrupts = <GIC_PPI 14 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(2) |
  						  IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH)>;
  			clocks = <&periph_clk>;
  		};
+
+		gic: interrupt-controller at 19021000 {
+			compatible = "arm,cortex-a9-gic";
+			#interrupt-cells = <3>;
+			#address-cells = <0>;
+			interrupt-controller;
+			reg = <0x21000 0x1000>,
+			      <0x20100 0x100>;
+		};
+
+		L2: l2-cache {
+			compatible = "arm,pl310-cache";
+			reg = <0x22000 0x1000>;
+			cache-unified;
+			cache-level = <2>;
+		};
 From here and above, all labels are wrong. You are moving them into a 
bus that has translated bus addresses, but you still use absolute 
addresses for all labels.

And again, 1) Why is this change imbedded in a patch meant for adding DT 
clock support according to the commit message; 2) how does the 
dependency work with the other patches that you are about to send out?

quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
  	};

  	clocks {
@@ -103,10 +111,34 @@
  		#size-cells = <1>;
  		ranges;

-		periph_clk: periph_clk {
+		osc: oscillator {
+			#clock-cells = <0>;
  			compatible = "fixed-clock";
+			clock-frequency = <25000000>;
+		};
+
+		iprocmed: iprocmed {
+			#clock-cells = <0>;
+			compatible = "fixed-factor-clock";
+			clocks = <&genpll BCM_NSP_GENPLL_IPROCFAST_CLK>;
+			clock-div = <2>;
+			clock-mult = <1>;
+		};
+
+		iprocslow: iprocslow {
+			#clock-cells = <0>;
+			compatible = "fixed-factor-clock";
+			clocks = <&genpll BCM_NSP_GENPLL_IPROCFAST_CLK>;
+			clock-div = <4>;
+			clock-mult = <1>;
+		};
+
+		periph_clk: periph_clk {
  			#clock-cells = <0>;
-			clock-frequency = <500000000>;
+			compatible = "fixed-factor-clock";
+			clocks = <&a9pll>;
+			clock-div = <2>;
+			clock-mult = <1>;
  		};
  	};
@@ -118,17 +150,17 @@

  		uart0: serial at 18000300 {
  			compatible = "ns16550a";
-			reg = <0x0300 0x100>;
+			reg = <0x000300 0x100>;
  			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 85 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
-			clock-frequency = <62499840>;
+			clocks = <&osc>;
  			status = "disabled";
  		};

  		uart1: serial at 18000400 {
  			compatible = "ns16550a";
-			reg = <0x0400 0x100>;
+			reg = <0x000400 0x100>;
  			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 85 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
-			clock-frequency = <62499840>;
+			clocks = <&osc>;
  			status = "disabled";
  		};
@@ -217,5 +249,24 @@

  			brcm,nand-has-wp;
  		};
+
+		lcpll0: lcpll0 at 1803f100 {
wrong label
+			#clock-cells = <1>;
+			compatible = "brcm,nsp-lcpll0";
+			reg = <0x03f100 0x14>;
+			clocks = <&osc>;
+			clock-output-names = "lcpll0", "pcie_phy", "sdio",
+					     "ddr_phy";
+		};
+
+		genpll: genpll at 1803f140 {
wrong label
+			#clock-cells = <1>;
+			compatible = "brcm,nsp-genpll";
+			reg = <0x03f140 0x24>;
+			clocks = <&osc>;
+			clock-output-names = "genpll", "phy", "ethernetclk",
+					     "usbclk", "iprocfast", "sata1",
+					     "sata2";
+		};
  	};
  };
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help