On 16 November 2015 at 17:43, Russell King - ARM Linux
[off-list ref] wrote:

On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 05:32:05PM +0000, Daniel Stone wrote:

quoted

On 16 November 2015 at 17:22, Russell King - ARM Linux
[off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Please sensibly wrap your messages.  Your lines are longer than 80
characters which makes it exceedingly difficult for some people to reply
to your very very very very very very very very very very very very
very very very very very very very very very very very very very very
very very very very very very very very very very very very very very
very very very very very very very very very very very very very very
very very very very very very very very very very very very very very
very very very very very very long lines without first reformatting
them manually - and why should they bother to reply if they have that
kind of additional work?  Thanks.

His lines are wrapped mostly at 80, but sometimes at 86, characters.
You should probably look into fixing your MUA.

No.

Standard net etiquette is that email should be wrapped around 72
characters to give space for reply indentation to remain readable
on an 80 column screen. Most of my email replies are written on an
80 column screen.

Oh, I just thought there was
a greater reason for your
660-character tantrum
than someone overshooting
by 14 characters on
a couple of lines.

Then again,
having read the
rest of the
pointlessly hostile mail,
it's entirely in keeping
with the rest.

Shame that your
needless aggression
obscures a
fairly valid
point.

Have
a
lovely
even
ing
.