[PATCH v7 0/4] KASAN for arm64
From: catalin.marinas@arm.com (Catalin Marinas)
Date: 2015-11-16 16:51:09
Also in:
linux-mm, lkml
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 06:34:27PM +0300, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
On 11/16/2015 02:16 PM, Suzuki K. Poulose wrote:quoted
On 13/10/15 09:34, Catalin Marinas wrote:quoted
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 06:52:56PM +0300, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:quoted
Andrey Ryabinin (3): arm64: move PGD_SIZE definition to pgalloc.h arm64: add KASAN support Documentation/features/KASAN: arm64 supports KASAN now Linus Walleij (1): ARM64: kasan: print memory assignmentPatches queued for 4.4. Thanks.I get the following failure with KASAN + 16K_PAGES + 48BIT_VA, with 4.4-rc1: arch/arm64/mm/kasan_init.c: In function ?kasan_early_init?: include/linux/compiler.h:484:38: error: call to ?__compiletime_assert_95? declared with attribute error: BUILD_BUG_ON failed: !IS_ALIGNED(KASAN_SHADOW_END, PGDIR_SIZE) _compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __LINE__) ^ include/linux/compiler.h:467:4: note: in definition of macro ?__compiletime_assert? prefix ## suffix(); \ ^ include/linux/compiler.h:484:2: note: in expansion of macro ?_compiletime_assert? _compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __LINE__) ^ include/linux/bug.h:50:37: note: in expansion of macro ?compiletime_assert? #define BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(cond, msg) compiletime_assert(!(cond), msg) ^ include/linux/bug.h:74:2: note: in expansion of macro ?BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG? BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(condition, "BUILD_BUG_ON failed: " #condition) ^ arch/arm64/mm/kasan_init.c:95:2: note: in expansion of macro ?BUILD_BUG_ON? BUILD_BUG_ON(!IS_ALIGNED(KASAN_SHADOW_END, PGDIR_SIZE)); The problem is that the PGDIR_SIZE is (1UL << 47) with 16K+48bit, which makes the KASAN_SHADOW_END unaligned(which is aligned to (1UL << (48 - 3)) ). Is the alignment really needed ? Thoughts on how best we could fix this ?Yes, it's really needed, because some code relies on this (e.g. clear_pgs() and kasan_init()). But it should be possible to get rid of this requirement.
I don't think clear_pgds() and kasan_init() are the only problems. IIUC, kasan_populate_zero_shadow() also assumes that KASan shadow covers multiple pgds. You need some kind of recursive writing which avoids populating an entry which is not empty (like kasan_early_pud_populate). -- Catalin