Thread (20 messages) 20 messages, 3 authors, 2015-11-16

[PATCH v5 2/6] arm64: ftrace: fix a stack tracer's output under function graph tracer

From: AKASHI Takahiro <hidden>
Date: 2015-11-10 02:42:40
Also in: lkml

On 11/09/2015 11:04 PM, Jungseok Lee wrote:
On Nov 6, 2015, at 3:44 PM, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:

Hi Akashi,
quoted
Function graph tracer modifies a return address (LR) in a stack frame
to hook a function return. This will result in many useless entries
(return_to_handler) showing up in a stack tracer's output.

This patch replaces such entries with originals values preserved in
current->ret_stack[].

Signed-off-by: AKASHI Takahiro <redacted>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/ftrace.h |    2 ++
arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c  |   21 +++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 23 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/ftrace.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/ftrace.h
index c5534fa..3c60f37 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/ftrace.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/ftrace.h
@@ -28,6 +28,8 @@ struct dyn_arch_ftrace {
extern unsigned long ftrace_graph_call;

+extern void return_to_handler(void);
+
static inline unsigned long ftrace_call_adjust(unsigned long addr)
{
	/*
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
index ccb6078..5fd3477 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
  */
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/export.h>
+#include <linux/ftrace.h>
#include <linux/sched.h>
#include <linux/stacktrace.h>
@@ -73,6 +74,9 @@ struct stack_trace_data {
	struct stack_trace *trace;
	unsigned int no_sched_functions;
	unsigned int skip;
+#ifdef CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER
+	unsigned int ret_stack_index;
+#endif
};

static int save_trace(struct stackframe *frame, void *d)
@@ -81,6 +85,20 @@ static int save_trace(struct stackframe *frame, void *d)
	struct stack_trace *trace = data->trace;
	unsigned long addr = frame->pc;

+#ifdef CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER
+	if (addr == (unsigned long)return_to_handler - AARCH64_INSN_SIZE) {
not if (adds == (unsigned long)return_to_handler)?
quoted
+		/*
+		 * This is a case where function graph tracer has
+		 * modified a return address (LR) in a stack frame
+		 * to hook a function return.
+		 * So replace it to an original value.
+		 */
+		frame->pc = addr =
+			current->ret_stack[data->ret_stack_index--].ret
+							- AARCH64_INSN_SIZE;
Ditto. not without AARCH64_INSN_SIZE?

I've observed many return_to_handler without the changes.
Am I missing something?
You're right!
I thought I had tested the patches, but...
quoted
+	}
+#endif /* CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER */
+
	if (data->no_sched_functions && in_sched_functions(addr))
		return 0;
	if (data->skip) {
@@ -100,6 +118,9 @@ void save_stack_trace_tsk(struct task_struct *tsk, struct stack_trace *trace)
	data.trace = trace;
	data.skip = trace->skip;
+#ifdef CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER
+	data.ret_stack_index = current->curr_ret_stack;
Can I get an idea on why current->curr_ret_stack is used instead of
tsk->curr_ret_stack?
Thanks for pointing this out.
Will fix it although it works without a change since save_stack_trace_sp() is
called only in a 'current task' context.

-Takahiro AKASHI
Best Regards
Jungseok Lee
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help