[PATCH v5 2/6] arm64: ftrace: fix a stack tracer's output under function graph tracer
From: AKASHI Takahiro <hidden>
Date: 2015-11-10 02:42:40
Also in:
lkml
On 11/09/2015 11:04 PM, Jungseok Lee wrote:
On Nov 6, 2015, at 3:44 PM, AKASHI Takahiro wrote: Hi Akashi,quoted
Function graph tracer modifies a return address (LR) in a stack frame to hook a function return. This will result in many useless entries (return_to_handler) showing up in a stack tracer's output. This patch replaces such entries with originals values preserved in current->ret_stack[]. Signed-off-by: AKASHI Takahiro <redacted> --- arch/arm64/include/asm/ftrace.h | 2 ++ arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+)diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/ftrace.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/ftrace.h index c5534fa..3c60f37 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/ftrace.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/ftrace.h@@ -28,6 +28,8 @@ struct dyn_arch_ftrace {extern unsigned long ftrace_graph_call; +extern void return_to_handler(void); + static inline unsigned long ftrace_call_adjust(unsigned long addr) { /*diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c index ccb6078..5fd3477 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ */#include <linux/kernel.h> #include <linux/export.h> +#include <linux/ftrace.h> #include <linux/sched.h> #include <linux/stacktrace.h>@@ -73,6 +74,9 @@ struct stack_trace_data {struct stack_trace *trace; unsigned int no_sched_functions; unsigned int skip; +#ifdef CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER + unsigned int ret_stack_index; +#endif }; static int save_trace(struct stackframe *frame, void *d)@@ -81,6 +85,20 @@ static int save_trace(struct stackframe *frame, void *d)struct stack_trace *trace = data->trace; unsigned long addr = frame->pc; +#ifdef CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER + if (addr == (unsigned long)return_to_handler - AARCH64_INSN_SIZE) {not if (adds == (unsigned long)return_to_handler)?quoted
+ /* + * This is a case where function graph tracer has + * modified a return address (LR) in a stack frame + * to hook a function return. + * So replace it to an original value. + */ + frame->pc = addr = + current->ret_stack[data->ret_stack_index--].ret + - AARCH64_INSN_SIZE;Ditto. not without AARCH64_INSN_SIZE? I've observed many return_to_handler without the changes. Am I missing something?
You're right! I thought I had tested the patches, but...
quoted
+ } +#endif /* CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER */ + if (data->no_sched_functions && in_sched_functions(addr)) return 0; if (data->skip) {@@ -100,6 +118,9 @@ void save_stack_trace_tsk(struct task_struct *tsk, struct stack_trace *trace)data.trace = trace; data.skip = trace->skip; +#ifdef CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER + data.ret_stack_index = current->curr_ret_stack;Can I get an idea on why current->curr_ret_stack is used instead of tsk->curr_ret_stack?
Thanks for pointing this out. Will fix it although it works without a change since save_stack_trace_sp() is called only in a 'current task' context. -Takahiro AKASHI
Best Regards Jungseok Lee