On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 7:12 AM, Michal Simek [off-list ref] wrote:
On 10/18/2015 09:08 PM, Josh Cartwright wrote:
quoted
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 03:42:27PM -0700, Moritz Fischer wrote:
quoted
Hi all,
I've tried to address most of the feedback that was brought up,
the one thing I haven't looked at was the firmware format part,
since that was still in discussion.
So I'm still open to suggestions on how to handle this.
Was there disagreement? I had thought we settled on limiting the
handling the BIN format explicitly, the rest of the thread was about
userspace tooling for BIT->BIN conversion.
yep. Only BIN handling and keep small BIN header with sync word.
Greg had already queued the v2 this weekend (which caught me by
suprise). I tried to figure out if it's possible to send a v3,
but he said to send follow up patches as he can't rebase the branch he
merged it into.
I will have access to hardware this afternoon, and send out follow up
patches to fix the BIN vs BIT issue.
Thanks,
Michal
Cheers,
Moritz