Thread (11 messages) 11 messages, 3 authors, 2015-10-15

[PATCH V2 6/6] gicv2m: acpi: Introducing GICv2m ACPI support

From: suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com (Suravee Suthikulanit)
Date: 2015-10-15 14:30:35
Also in: linux-acpi, lkml

Hi Tomasz,

On 10/15/2015 9:03 AM, Suravee Suthikulanit wrote:
quoted
quoted
+    if (!data)
+        return NULL;
+
+    return data->fwnode;
+}
+
+static int __init
+acpi_parse_madt_msi(struct acpi_subtable_header *header,
+            const unsigned long end)
+{
+    int ret;
+    struct resource res;
+    u32 spi_start = 0, nr_spis = 0;
+    struct acpi_madt_generic_msi_frame *m;
+    struct fwnode_handle *fwnode = NULL;
+
+    m = (struct acpi_madt_generic_msi_frame *)header;
+    if (BAD_MADT_ENTRY(m, end))
+        return -EINVAL;
+
+    res.start = m->base_address;
+    res.end = m->base_address + 0x1000;
+
+    if (m->flags & ACPI_MADT_OVERRIDE_SPI_VALUES) {
+        spi_start = m->spi_base;
+        nr_spis = m->spi_count;
+
+        pr_info("ACPI overriding V2M MSI_TYPER (base:%u, num:%u)\n",
+            spi_start, nr_spis);
+    }
+
+    fwnode = irq_domain_alloc_fwnode((void *)m->base_address);
+    if (!fwnode) {
+        pr_err("Unable to allocate GICv2m domain token\n");
+        return -EINVAL;
+    }
+
+    ret = gicv2m_init_one(fwnode, spi_start, nr_spis, &res);
I case of error, we should call here:
irq_domain_free_fwnode(fwnode);
This should have already been handled when returning from the
acpi_parse_madt_msi() in gicv2m_teardown() since we would need to
iterate through all existing MSI frame to clean up.
Actually, you are correct since the fwnode allocated here might not get 
assigned to the v2m_data.fwnode and added to the v2m_nodes list yet. So, 
we would need to call irq_domain_alloc_fwnode() here in case of error.

Thanks,
Suravee
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help