Thread (4 messages) 4 messages, 2 authors, 2015-10-14

[PATCH] md: fix 32-bit build warning

From: Neil Brown <hidden>
Date: 2015-10-14 22:11:38
Also in: linux-raid, lkml

Arnd Bergmann [off-list ref] writes:
On Monday 12 October 2015 15:59:27 Neil Brown wrote:
quoted
quoted
diff --git a/drivers/md/md.c b/drivers/md/md.c
index 7fff1e6884d6..e13f72a3b561 100644
--- a/drivers/md/md.c
+++ b/drivers/md/md.c
@@ -8987,9 +8987,9 @@ static void check_sb_changes(struct mddev *mddev, struct md_rdev *rdev)
 
      /* recovery_cp changed */
      if (le64_to_cpu(sb->resync_offset) != mddev->recovery_cp) {
-             pr_info("%s:%d recovery_cp changed from %lu to %lu\n", __func__,
-                             __LINE__, mddev->recovery_cp,
-                             (unsigned long) le64_to_cpu(sb->resync_offset));
+             pr_info("%s:%d recovery_cp changed from %llu to %llu\n", __func__,
+                             __LINE__, (u64)mddev->recovery_cp,
+                             (u64) le64_to_cpu(sb->resync_offset));
              mddev->recovery_cp = le64_to_cpu(sb->resync_offset);
      }
 
Thanks, but is this really right?
I think u64 is "unsigned long" on 64bit.
I have always used (unsigned long long) when I want to use %llu on
sector_t.

How confident are you of using "u64" ?
Very confident ;-)

This used to not work until some linux-2.6 version when we changed all
architectures to use asm-generic/int-ll64.h in the kernel, because
a lot of code relied on printing u64 variables using %lld.

I tend to use u64 for things like this because it's shorter than
'unsigned long long'.
Ahh.. good to know - thanks.

It seems that we've since removed those 'pr_info' lines, so there is
nothing to fix any more.  I'll remember that about using "u64" though -
using "unsigned long long" always felt so clumsy.

Thanks,
NeilBrown
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 818 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20151015/21512430/attachment-0001.sig>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help