[PATCH] md: fix 32-bit build warning
From: Neil Brown <hidden>
Date: 2015-10-14 22:11:38
Also in:
linux-raid, lkml
Arnd Bergmann [off-list ref] writes:
On Monday 12 October 2015 15:59:27 Neil Brown wrote:quoted
quoted
diff --git a/drivers/md/md.c b/drivers/md/md.c index 7fff1e6884d6..e13f72a3b561 100644 --- a/drivers/md/md.c +++ b/drivers/md/md.c@@ -8987,9 +8987,9 @@ static void check_sb_changes(struct mddev *mddev, struct md_rdev *rdev) /* recovery_cp changed */ if (le64_to_cpu(sb->resync_offset) != mddev->recovery_cp) { - pr_info("%s:%d recovery_cp changed from %lu to %lu\n", __func__, - __LINE__, mddev->recovery_cp, - (unsigned long) le64_to_cpu(sb->resync_offset)); + pr_info("%s:%d recovery_cp changed from %llu to %llu\n", __func__, + __LINE__, (u64)mddev->recovery_cp, + (u64) le64_to_cpu(sb->resync_offset)); mddev->recovery_cp = le64_to_cpu(sb->resync_offset); }Thanks, but is this really right? I think u64 is "unsigned long" on 64bit. I have always used (unsigned long long) when I want to use %llu on sector_t. How confident are you of using "u64" ?Very confident ;-) This used to not work until some linux-2.6 version when we changed all architectures to use asm-generic/int-ll64.h in the kernel, because a lot of code relied on printing u64 variables using %lld. I tend to use u64 for things like this because it's shorter than 'unsigned long long'.
Ahh.. good to know - thanks. It seems that we've since removed those 'pr_info' lines, so there is nothing to fix any more. I'll remember that about using "u64" though - using "unsigned long long" always felt so clumsy. Thanks, NeilBrown -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 818 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20151015/21512430/attachment-0001.sig>