[PATCH v7 5/6] Documentation: dt-bindings: pci: altera pcie device tree binding
From: Ley Foon Tan <hidden>
Date: 2015-10-05 03:14:11
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-pci, lkml
From: Ley Foon Tan <hidden>
Date: 2015-10-05 03:14:11
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-pci, lkml
On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 5:56 AM, Arnd Bergmann [off-list ref] wrote:
On Friday 02 October 2015 15:53:44 Ley Foon Tan wrote:quoted
quoted
Strictly speaking, if you have undocumented bindings downstream that is your problem and we don't have to accept them as-is upstream. I'm not going to worry about that here.quoted
quoted
txs contains the config space?It is not the config space, but a memory slave port.Then where is the config space? It should not be part of "ranges" is all I care about.The config space is not part of "ranges". Our IP uses TLP packet to access config space.It took me a bit to figure out what you mean here. To save others from reading the source, here is what I found: * The config space is accessed indirectly through registers from the "cra" register range, which is the right approach according to the point that Rob made.
You are right.
* hardware-wise this basically looks like bit-banged PCIe, which is both awesome and scary ;-)