Thread (36 messages) flat view 36 messages, 14 authors, 2015-11-02
STALE3978d

Revision v1 of 12 in this series.

Revisions (12)
  1. v1 [diff vs current]
  2. v1 [diff vs current]
  3. v1 [diff vs current]
  4. v1 [diff vs current]
  5. v1 [diff vs current]
  6. v1 [diff vs current]
  7. v1 [diff vs current]
  8. v1 [diff vs current]
  9. v1 [diff vs current]
  10. v1 [diff vs current]
  11. v1 current
  12. v1 [diff vs current]

[PATCH 2/2] Convert smsc911x to use ACPI as well as DT

From: dwmw2@infradead.org (David Woodhouse)
Date: 2015-09-23 21:03:32
Also in: netdev

On Wed, 2015-09-23 at 22:51 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
But if the device ID is assigned already, why would it hurt to 
actually use it?
It doesn't hurt at all, as long as we understand that there was no need
to assign it a device ID at all, at least for Linux's benefit. And as
long as it doesn't set a precedent that makes other people think they
need to do so.

-- 
dwmw2

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 5691 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20150923/39f45f7d/attachment.bin>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help