[PATCH 17/17] mfd : ab8500/db8500: fix the abuse of IRQF_NO_SUSPEND
From: Lee Jones <hidden>
Date: 2015-09-22 21:03:31
Also in:
linux-pm, lkml
On Tue, 22 Sep 2015, Sudeep Holla wrote:
On 22/09/15 00:20, Lee Jones wrote:quoted
On Mon, 21 Sep 2015, Sudeep Holla wrote:quoted
The IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flag is used to identify the interrupts that should be left enabled so as to allow them to work as expected during the suspend-resume cycle, but doesn't guarantee that it will wake the system from a suspended state, enable_irq_wake is recommended to be used for the wakeup. This patch removes the use of IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flags replacing it with enable_irq_wake instead. Cc: Linus Walleij <redacted> Cc: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <redacted> --- drivers/mfd/ab8500-core.c | 11 +++++++++-- drivers/mfd/ab8500-debugfs.c | 2 +- drivers/mfd/ab8500-gpadc.c | 15 +++++++++++---- drivers/mfd/db8500-prcmu.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++------- drivers/power/ab8500_btemp.c | 6 ++++-- drivers/power/ab8500_charger.c | 6 ++++-- drivers/power/ab8500_fg.c | 9 ++++++--- drivers/thermal/db8500_thermal.c | 5 ++--- drivers/usb/phy/phy-ab8500-usb.c | 10 ++++++---- 9 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)Is there a reason for bundling the changes in all of these subsystems together into a single patch?No, I understand this needs to be split. Since I was not 100% confident about this change, I wanted LinusW to review and provide feedback and gets things working before I can split this changes. I must have added RFC, but usually it gets ignored :)
Best if Linus reviews the correct patch-set. Please split and resubmit. -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog