[PATCH v12 1/5] mtd: nand: vf610_nfc: Freescale NFC for VF610, MPC5125 and others
From: Alexey Klimov <hidden>
Date: 2015-09-04 04:10:15
Also in:
linux-devicetree, lkml
Hi Stefan, just few very small comments. On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 4:06 AM, Stefan Agner [off-list ref] wrote: [..]
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
--- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/vf610_nfc.c
[..]
+static inline u32 vf610_nfc_read(struct vf610_nfc *nfc, uint reg)
+{
+ return readl(nfc->regs + reg);
+}
+
+static inline void vf610_nfc_write(struct vf610_nfc *nfc, uint reg, u32 val)
+{
+ writel(val, nfc->regs + reg);
+}
+
+static inline void vf610_nfc_set(struct vf610_nfc *nfc, uint reg, u32 bits)
+{
+ vf610_nfc_write(nfc, reg, vf610_nfc_read(nfc, reg) | bits);
+}
+
+static inline void vf610_nfc_clear(struct vf610_nfc *nfc, uint reg, u32 bits)
+{
+ vf610_nfc_write(nfc, reg, vf610_nfc_read(nfc, reg) & ~bits);
+}
+
+static inline void vf610_nfc_set_field(struct vf610_nfc *nfc, u32 reg,
+ u32 mask, u32 shift, u32 val)
+{
+ vf610_nfc_write(nfc, reg,
+ (vf610_nfc_read(nfc, reg) & (~mask)) | val << shift);
+}
+
+static inline void vf610_nfc_memcpy(void *dst, const void __iomem *src,
+ size_t n)
+{
+ /*
+ * Use this accessor for the internal SRAM buffers. On the ARM
+ * Freescale Vybrid SoC it's known that the driver can treat
+ * the SRAM buffer as if it's memory. Other platform might need
+ * to treat the buffers differently.
+ *
+ * For the time being, use memcpy
+ */
+ memcpy(dst, src, n);
+}
+
+/* Clear flags for upcoming command */
+static inline void vf610_nfc_clear_status(struct vf610_nfc *nfc)
+{
+ u32 tmp = vf610_nfc_read(nfc, NFC_IRQ_STATUS);
+
+ tmp |= CMD_DONE_CLEAR_BIT | IDLE_CLEAR_BIT;
+ vf610_nfc_write(nfc, NFC_IRQ_STATUS, tmp);
+}There is general intention on maillists that I see sometimes is to make people get rid of 'inline' for static functions in *.c files and let compiler decide how to optimize that.
+static int vf610_nfc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ struct vf610_nfc *nfc;
+ struct resource *res;
+ struct mtd_info *mtd;
+ struct nand_chip *chip;
+ struct device_node *child;
+ const struct of_device_id *of_id;
+ int err = 0;According to usage you don't need to initialize err to zero here.
+ int irq;
+
+ nfc = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*nfc), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!nfc)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ nfc->dev = &pdev->dev;
+ mtd = &nfc->mtd;
+ chip = &nfc->chip;
+
+ mtd->priv = chip;
+ mtd->owner = THIS_MODULE;
+ mtd->dev.parent = nfc->dev;
+ mtd->name = DRV_NAME;
+
+ irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
+ if (irq <= 0)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
+ nfc->regs = devm_ioremap_resource(nfc->dev, res);
+ if (IS_ERR(nfc->regs))
+ return PTR_ERR(nfc->regs);
+
+ nfc->clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
+ if (IS_ERR(nfc->clk))
+ return PTR_ERR(nfc->clk);
+
+ err = clk_prepare_enable(nfc->clk);
+ if (err) {
+ dev_err(nfc->dev, "Unable to enable clock!\n");
+ return err;
+ }After fixing that feel free to use: Reviewed-by: Alexey Klimov <redacted> Thanks, Alexey Klimov