Thread (11 messages) 11 messages, 3 authors, 2015-10-07

[PATCH v12 1/5] mtd: nand: vf610_nfc: Freescale NFC for VF610, MPC5125 and others

From: Alexey Klimov <hidden>
Date: 2015-09-04 04:10:15
Also in: linux-devicetree, lkml

Hi Stefan,

just few very small comments.

On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 4:06 AM, Stefan Agner [off-list ref] wrote:

[..]
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/vf610_nfc.c
[..]
+static inline u32 vf610_nfc_read(struct vf610_nfc *nfc, uint reg)
+{
+       return readl(nfc->regs + reg);
+}
+
+static inline void vf610_nfc_write(struct vf610_nfc *nfc, uint reg, u32 val)
+{
+       writel(val, nfc->regs + reg);
+}
+
+static inline void vf610_nfc_set(struct vf610_nfc *nfc, uint reg, u32 bits)
+{
+       vf610_nfc_write(nfc, reg, vf610_nfc_read(nfc, reg) | bits);
+}
+
+static inline void vf610_nfc_clear(struct vf610_nfc *nfc, uint reg, u32 bits)
+{
+       vf610_nfc_write(nfc, reg, vf610_nfc_read(nfc, reg) & ~bits);
+}
+
+static inline void vf610_nfc_set_field(struct vf610_nfc *nfc, u32 reg,
+                                      u32 mask, u32 shift, u32 val)
+{
+       vf610_nfc_write(nfc, reg,
+                       (vf610_nfc_read(nfc, reg) & (~mask)) | val << shift);
+}
+
+static inline void vf610_nfc_memcpy(void *dst, const void __iomem *src,
+                                   size_t n)
+{
+       /*
+        * Use this accessor for the internal SRAM buffers. On the ARM
+        * Freescale Vybrid SoC it's known that the driver can treat
+        * the SRAM buffer as if it's memory. Other platform might need
+        * to treat the buffers differently.
+        *
+        * For the time being, use memcpy
+        */
+       memcpy(dst, src, n);
+}
+
+/* Clear flags for upcoming command */
+static inline void vf610_nfc_clear_status(struct vf610_nfc *nfc)
+{
+       u32 tmp = vf610_nfc_read(nfc, NFC_IRQ_STATUS);
+
+       tmp |= CMD_DONE_CLEAR_BIT | IDLE_CLEAR_BIT;
+       vf610_nfc_write(nfc, NFC_IRQ_STATUS, tmp);
+}
There is general intention on maillists that I see sometimes is to
make people get rid of
'inline' for static functions in *.c files and let compiler decide how
to optimize that.

+static int vf610_nfc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+       struct vf610_nfc *nfc;
+       struct resource *res;
+       struct mtd_info *mtd;
+       struct nand_chip *chip;
+       struct device_node *child;
+       const struct of_device_id *of_id;
+       int err = 0;
According to usage you don't need to initialize err to zero here.
+       int irq;
+
+       nfc = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*nfc), GFP_KERNEL);
+       if (!nfc)
+               return -ENOMEM;
+
+       nfc->dev = &pdev->dev;
+       mtd = &nfc->mtd;
+       chip = &nfc->chip;
+
+       mtd->priv = chip;
+       mtd->owner = THIS_MODULE;
+       mtd->dev.parent = nfc->dev;
+       mtd->name = DRV_NAME;
+
+       irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
+       if (irq <= 0)
+               return -EINVAL;
+
+       res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
+       nfc->regs = devm_ioremap_resource(nfc->dev, res);
+       if (IS_ERR(nfc->regs))
+               return PTR_ERR(nfc->regs);
+
+       nfc->clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
+       if (IS_ERR(nfc->clk))
+               return PTR_ERR(nfc->clk);
+
+       err = clk_prepare_enable(nfc->clk);
+       if (err) {
+               dev_err(nfc->dev, "Unable to enable clock!\n");
+               return err;
+       }
After fixing that feel free to use:

Reviewed-by: Alexey Klimov <redacted>

Thanks,
Alexey Klimov
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help