[PATCH v3 3/6] remoteproc: Supply controller driver for ST's Remote Processors
From: Suman Anna <hidden>
Date: 2015-09-03 19:53:34
Also in:
linux-devicetree, lkml
Hi Lee, On 09/02/2015 10:38 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Signed-off-by: Ludovic Barre <redacted> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <redacted> --- drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig | 9 ++ drivers/remoteproc/Makefile | 1 + drivers/remoteproc/st_remoteproc.c | 307 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 317 insertions(+) create mode 100644 drivers/remoteproc/st_remoteproc.cdiff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig b/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig index 28c711f..72e97d7 100644 --- a/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig@@ -77,4 +77,13 @@ config DA8XX_REMOTEPROC It's safe to say n here if you're not interested in multimedia offloading. +config ST_REMOTEPROC + tristate "ST remoteproc support" + depends on ARCH_STI + select REMOTEPROC + help + Say y here to support ST's adjunct processors via the remote + processor framework. + This can be either built-in or a loadable module. + endmenudiff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile b/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile index 81b04d1..279cb2e 100644 --- a/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile@@ -11,3 +11,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_OMAP_REMOTEPROC) += omap_remoteproc.o obj-$(CONFIG_STE_MODEM_RPROC) += ste_modem_rproc.o obj-$(CONFIG_WKUP_M3_RPROC) += wkup_m3_rproc.o obj-$(CONFIG_DA8XX_REMOTEPROC) += da8xx_remoteproc.o +obj-$(CONFIG_ST_REMOTEPROC) += st_remoteproc.odiff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/st_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/st_remoteproc.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000..24ae6d3 --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/st_remoteproc.c@@ -0,0 +1,307 @@ +/* + * ST's Remote Processor Control Driver + * + * Copyright (C) 2015 STMicroelectronics - All Rights Reserved + * + * Author: Ludovic Barre <ludovic.barre@st.com> + * + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as + * published by the Free Software Foundation. + */ + +#include <linux/clk.h> +#include <linux/dma-mapping.h> +#include <linux/err.h> +#include <linux/interrupt.h> +#include <linux/kernel.h> +#include <linux/mfd/syscon.h> +#include <linux/module.h> +#include <linux/of.h> +#include <linux/of_device.h> +#include <linux/platform_device.h> +#include <linux/regmap.h> +#include <linux/remoteproc.h> +#include <linux/reset.h> + +struct st_rproc_config { + bool sw_reset; + bool pwr_reset; + u32 bootaddr_mask; +}; + +struct st_rproc { + struct st_rproc_config *config; + struct reset_control *sw_reset; + struct reset_control *pwr_reset; + struct clk *clk; + u32 clk_rate; + struct regmap *boot_base; + u32 boot_offset; +}; + +static int st_rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc) +{ + struct st_rproc *ddata = rproc->priv; + int sw_err = 0, pwr_err = 0; + + if (ddata->config->sw_reset) { + sw_err = reset_control_assert(ddata->sw_reset); + if (sw_err) + dev_err(&rproc->dev, "Failed to assert S/W Reset\n"); + } + + if (ddata->config->pwr_reset) { + pwr_err = reset_control_assert(ddata->pwr_reset); + if (pwr_err) + dev_err(&rproc->dev, "Failed to assert Power Reset\n"); + } + + clk_disable(ddata->clk); + + return sw_err ?: pwr_err; +}
nit, can you please move st_rproc_stop function after st_rproc_start, same order as in fw_ops, for better flow.
+
+static int st_rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc)
+{
+ struct st_rproc *ddata = rproc->priv;
+ int err;
+
+ regmap_update_bits(ddata->boot_base, ddata->boot_offset,
+ ddata->config->bootaddr_mask, rproc->bootaddr);
+
+ err = clk_enable(ddata->clk);
+ if (err) {
+ dev_err(&rproc->dev, "Failed to enable clock\n");
+ return err;
+ }
+
+ if (ddata->config->sw_reset) {
+ err = reset_control_deassert(ddata->sw_reset);
+ if (err) {
+ dev_err(&rproc->dev, "Failed to deassert S/W Reset\n");
+ goto sw_reset_fail;
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (ddata->config->pwr_reset) {
+ err = reset_control_deassert(ddata->pwr_reset);
+ if (err) {
+ dev_err(&rproc->dev, "Failed to deassert Power Reset\n");
+ goto pwr_reset_fail;
+ }
+ }
+
+ dev_info(&rproc->dev, "Started from 0x%x\n", rproc->bootaddr);
+
+ return 0;
+
+
+pwr_reset_fail:
+ reset_control_assert(ddata->sw_reset);Should this be under a check for (ddata->config->sw_reset). It is not clear from code whether the sw_reset and pwr_reset are exclusive of each of other or have both.
+sw_reset_fail:
+ clk_disable(ddata->clk);
+
+ return err;
+}
+
+static struct rproc_ops st_rproc_ops = {
+ .start = st_rproc_start,
+ .stop = st_rproc_stop,
+};
+
+/*
+ * Fetch state of the processor: 0 is off, 1 is on.
+ */
+static int st_rproc_state(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ struct rproc *rproc = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
+ struct st_rproc *ddata = rproc->priv;
+ int reset_sw = 0, reset_pwr = 0;
+
+ if (ddata->config->sw_reset)
+ reset_sw = reset_control_status(ddata->sw_reset);
+
+ if (ddata->config->pwr_reset)
+ reset_pwr = reset_control_status(ddata->pwr_reset);
+
+ if (reset_sw < 0 || reset_pwr < 0)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ return !reset_sw && !reset_pwr;
+}
+
+static const struct st_rproc_config st40_rproc_cfg = {
+ .sw_reset = true,
+ .pwr_reset = true,
+ .bootaddr_mask = GENMASK(28, 1),
+};
+
+static const struct st_rproc_config st231_rproc_cfg = {
+ .sw_reset = true,
+ .pwr_reset = false,
+ .bootaddr_mask = GENMASK(31, 6),
+};
+
+static const struct of_device_id st_rproc_match[] = {
+ { .compatible = "st,st40-rproc", .data = &st40_rproc_cfg },
+ { .compatible = "st,st231-rproc", .data = &st231_rproc_cfg },
+ {},
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, st_rproc_match);
+
+static int st_rproc_parse_dt(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
+ struct rproc *rproc = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
+ struct st_rproc *ddata = rproc->priv;
+ struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
+ struct resource *mem;
+ int err;
+
+ if (ddata->config->sw_reset) {
+ ddata->sw_reset = devm_reset_control_get(dev, "sw_reset");
+ if (IS_ERR(ddata->sw_reset)) {
+ dev_err(dev, "Failed to get S/W Reset\n");
+ return PTR_ERR(ddata->sw_reset);
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (ddata->config->pwr_reset) {
+ ddata->pwr_reset = devm_reset_control_get(dev, "pwr_reset");
+ if (IS_ERR(ddata->pwr_reset)) {
+ dev_err(dev, "Failed to get Power Reset\n");
+ return PTR_ERR(ddata->pwr_reset);
+ }
+ }
+
+ ddata->clk = devm_clk_get(dev, NULL);
+ if (IS_ERR(ddata->clk)) {
+ dev_err(dev, "Failed to get clock\n");
+ return PTR_ERR(ddata->clk);
+ }
+
+ err = of_property_read_u32(np, "clock-frequency", &ddata->clk_rate);
+ if (err) {
+ dev_err(dev, "failed to get clock frequency\n");
+ return err;
+ }
+
+ ddata->boot_base = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(np, "st,syscfg");
+ if (!ddata->boot_base) {
+ dev_err(dev, "Boot base not found\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ err = of_property_read_u32_index(np, "st,syscfg", 1,
+ &ddata->boot_offset);
+ if (err) {
+ dev_err(dev, "Boot offset not found\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ mem = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
+ if (!mem) {
+ dev_err(dev, "no rproc memory definition\n");
+ return -ENXIO;
+ }
+
+ if (!devm_request_mem_region(dev, mem->start,
+ resource_size(mem), pdev->name)) {
+ dev_err(dev, "failed to get memory region resource\n");
+ return -EBUSY;
+ }
+ err = dmam_declare_coherent_memory(dev, mem->start, mem->start,
+ resource_size(mem),
+ DMA_MEMORY_MAP |
+ DMA_MEMORY_EXCLUSIVE);
+ if (err < 0) {
+ dev_err(dev, "cannot declare coherent memory: %d\n", err);
+ return -ENXIO;
+ }What kind of memory will this be? If this a carveout memory being set-aside from DDR, you may want to use a reserved-memory node entry, with a "memory-region" property added to the rproc device node and use of_reserved_mem_device_init() and of_reserved_mem_device_release() API, following the standard semantics of reserved-memory as in Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reserved-memory/reserved-memory.txt. Obviously that will need a change in the binding as well.
+
+ err = clk_prepare(ddata->clk);
+ if (err)
+ dev_err(dev, "failed to get clock\n");
+
+ return err;
+}
+
+static int st_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
+ const struct of_device_id *match;
+ struct st_rproc *ddata;
+ struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
+ struct rproc *rproc;
+ int enabled;
+ int ret;
+
+ match = of_match_device((st_rproc_match), dev);
+ if (!match || !match->data) {
+ dev_err(dev, "No device match found\n");
+ return -ENODEV;
+ }
+
+ rproc = rproc_alloc(dev, np->name, &st_rproc_ops, NULL, sizeof(*ddata));
+ if (!rproc)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ ddata = rproc->priv;
+ ddata->config = (struct st_rproc_config *)match->data;I believe Ohad's preference is to explicitly set rproc->has_iommu to false.
+
+ platform_set_drvdata(pdev, rproc);
+
+ ret = st_rproc_parse_dt(pdev);
+ if (ret)
+ goto free_rproc;
+
+ enabled = st_rproc_state(pdev);
+ if (enabled < 0)
+ goto free_rproc;
+
+ if (enabled) {
+ atomic_inc(&rproc->power);
+ rproc->state = RPROC_RUNNING;I am curious about this change, who are you expecting to have booted the processor before the driver is probed?
+ } else {
+ clk_set_rate(ddata->clk, ddata->clk_rate);
+ }
+
+ ret = rproc_add(rproc);
+ if (ret)
+ goto free_rproc;
+
+ return 0;
+
+free_rproc:
+ rproc_put(rproc);
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static int st_rproc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ struct rproc *rproc = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
+ struct st_rproc *ddata = rproc->priv;
+
+ rproc_del(rproc);
+
+ clk_disable_unprepare(ddata->clk);
+
+ rproc_put(rproc);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static struct platform_driver st_rproc_driver = {
+ .probe = st_rproc_probe,
+ .remove = st_rproc_remove,
+ .driver = {
+ .name = "st-rproc",
+ .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(st_rproc_match),
+ },
+};
+module_platform_driver(st_rproc_driver);
+
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("ST Remote Processor Control Driver");
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Ludovic Barre [off-list ref]");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");